PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTFBX vs. NMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GTFBX vs. NMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GTFBX vs. NMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTFBX
T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund
0.06%6.52%2.48%8.40%-11.12%2.56%4.77%6.87%0.55%4.73%
NMI
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
5.52%10.52%7.03%1.90%-15.09%3.86%4.70%16.02%-8.07%7.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTFBX achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than NMI's 5.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GTFBX having a 2.27% annualized return and NMI not far ahead at 2.30%.


GTFBX

1D
0.37%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
0.06%
6M
2.76%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
4.58%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*
2.27%

NMI

1D
-0.86%
1M
3.79%
YTD
5.52%
6M
6.73%
1Y
10.11%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
2.04%
10Y*
2.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GTFBX vs. NMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTFBX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than NMI's 0.72% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GTFBX vs. NMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTFBX
GTFBX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GTFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GTFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

NMI
NMI Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
NMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMI Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTFBX vs. NMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTFBXNMIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

0.84

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

1.49

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.21

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

1.17

+0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.83

2.37

+3.46

GTFBX vs. NMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTFBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the NMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTFBX and NMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTFBXNMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

0.84

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.15

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.16

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.34

+0.72

Correlation

The correlation between GTFBX and NMI is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GTFBX vs. NMI - Dividend Comparison

GTFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than NMI's 4.40% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTFBX
T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund
6.54%6.11%3.28%3.47%2.05%2.10%2.34%2.61%2.91%2.94%3.01%3.22%
NMI
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
4.40%4.59%4.63%4.04%3.51%3.22%3.53%4.15%5.12%4.21%4.45%4.28%

Drawdowns

GTFBX vs. NMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTFBX drawdown since its inception was -15.79%, smaller than the maximum NMI drawdown of -28.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTFBX and NMI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GTFBXNMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.79%

-28.92%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.16%

-8.71%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.79%

-28.92%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.79%

-28.92%

+13.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-0.86%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-5.93%

+3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

4.31%

-2.92%

Volatility

GTFBX vs. NMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) is 1.35%, while Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that GTFBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GTFBXNMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

5.78%

-4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

7.44%

-5.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.29%

12.11%

-6.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.45%

13.59%

-9.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.16%

14.60%

-10.44%