PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GTFBX vs. FBND
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GTFBX and FBND is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

GTFBX vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.56%
-0.45%
GTFBX
FBND

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GTFBX:

0.78

FBND:

0.97

Sortino Ratio

GTFBX:

1.09

FBND:

1.42

Omega Ratio

GTFBX:

1.16

FBND:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

GTFBX:

0.63

FBND:

0.49

Martin Ratio

GTFBX:

2.52

FBND:

2.70

Ulcer Index

GTFBX:

1.22%

FBND:

1.91%

Daily Std Dev

GTFBX:

3.93%

FBND:

5.30%

Max Drawdown

GTFBX:

-15.23%

FBND:

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

GTFBX:

-1.60%

FBND:

-4.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTFBX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 1.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GTFBX having a 2.13% annualized return and FBND not far ahead at 2.16%.


GTFBX

YTD

0.19%

1M

0.66%

6M

0.57%

1Y

2.98%

5Y*

0.85%

10Y*

2.13%

FBND

YTD

1.20%

1M

0.73%

6M

-0.46%

1Y

5.34%

5Y*

0.56%

10Y*

2.16%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GTFBX vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTFBX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


GTFBX
T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund
Expense ratio chart for GTFBX: current value at 0.56% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.56%
Expense ratio chart for FBND: current value at 0.36% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.36%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GTFBX vs. FBND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTFBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GTFBX is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GTFBX is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GTFBX is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GTFBX is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GTFBX is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GTFBX is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBND is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBND is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBND is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBND is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBND is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBND is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GTFBX vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GTFBX, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.780.97
The chart of Sortino ratio for GTFBX, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.091.42
The chart of Omega ratio for GTFBX, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.161.17
The chart of Calmar ratio for GTFBX, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.630.49
The chart of Martin ratio for GTFBX, currently valued at 2.52, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.002.522.70
GTFBX
FBND

The current GTFBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTFBX and FBND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.78
0.97
GTFBX
FBND

Dividends

GTFBX vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

GTFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than FBND's 4.63% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GTFBX
T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund
3.30%3.28%3.03%2.69%2.08%2.33%2.59%2.91%2.95%3.02%3.22%3.28%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.63%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%0.66%

Drawdowns

GTFBX vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTFBX drawdown since its inception was -15.23%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTFBX and FBND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.60%
-4.40%
GTFBX
FBND

Volatility

GTFBX vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) is 1.07%, while Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that GTFBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.07%
1.33%
GTFBX
FBND
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab