PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMI vs. FLAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMI vs. FLAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI) and Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMI achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly higher than FLAAX's 1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, NMI has outperformed FLAAX with an annualized return of 2.05%, while FLAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.


NMI

1D
-4.54%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
8.28%
6M
8.01%
1Y
11.45%
3Y*
8.44%
5Y*
1.88%
10Y*
2.05%

FLAAX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.66%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.67%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*
1.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMI vs. FLAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMI
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
8.28%10.52%7.03%1.90%-15.09%3.86%4.70%16.02%-8.07%7.49%
FLAAX
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund
1.31%2.78%2.58%6.52%-16.29%3.89%5.64%9.03%0.50%8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between NMI and FLAAX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 1988

0.15

The correlation between NMI and FLAAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMI vs. FLAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMI
NMI Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
NMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMI Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
NMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMI Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FLAAX
FLAAX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FLAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMI vs. FLAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI) and Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NMIFLAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.49

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

1.83

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.46

5.27

-2.81

NMI vs. FLAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the FLAAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMI and FLAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NMI vs. FLAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMI drawdown since its inception was -28.92%, which is greater than FLAAX's maximum drawdown of -21.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMI and FLAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMIFLAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.92%

-21.01%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-3.07%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.54%

-6.04%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.92%

-21.01%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.92%

-21.01%

-7.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.75%

-5.14%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.92%

-2.74%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

1.06%

+3.61%

Volatility

NMI vs. FLAAX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) at 0.82%. This indicates that NMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMIFLAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

0.82%

+5.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.35%

2.15%

+12.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

2.84%

+13.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

4.54%

+10.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.01%

4.65%

+10.36%

NMI vs. FLAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMI has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FLAAX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMI vs. FLAAX - Dividend Comparison

NMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than FLAAX's 3.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLAAX
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund
3.88%4.21%3.85%3.55%3.39%2.83%3.07%3.69%3.72%3.65%3.79%3.84%
NMI
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
4.33%4.59%4.63%4.04%3.51%3.22%3.53%4.15%5.12%4.21%4.45%4.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMI and FLAAX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMI has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to FLAAX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMI dropped -28.92% vs FLAAX's -21.01%.

FLAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMI and FLAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer