GTFBX vs. MUB

In the year-to-date period, GTFBX achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than MUB's -1.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GTFBX having a 1.92% annualized return and MUB not far ahead at 1.98%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GTFBX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than MUB's 0.07% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GTFBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is comparable to the MUB Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTFBX and MUB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GTFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than MUB's 3.15% yield.

The maximum GTFBX drawdown since its inception was -15.22%, which is greater than MUB's maximum drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTFBX and MUB.

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Georgia Tax Free Bond Fund (GTFBX) is 0.76%, while iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that GTFBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.