PortfoliosLab logo
AEE vs. CMS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AEE and CMS is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AEE vs. CMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ameren Corporation (AEE) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AEE:

1.86

CMS:

0.95

Sortino Ratio

AEE:

2.50

CMS:

1.45

Omega Ratio

AEE:

1.33

CMS:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

AEE:

1.44

CMS:

1.27

Martin Ratio

AEE:

10.04

CMS:

4.35

Ulcer Index

AEE:

3.50%

CMS:

4.17%

Daily Std Dev

AEE:

19.07%

CMS:

17.63%

Max Drawdown

AEE:

-60.57%

CMS:

-91.20%

Current Drawdown

AEE:

-4.77%

CMS:

-4.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEE:

$26.57B

CMS:

$21.38B

EPS

AEE:

$4.51

CMS:

$3.38

PE Ratio

AEE:

21.73

CMS:

21.15

PEG Ratio

AEE:

2.41

CMS:

2.87

PS Ratio

AEE:

3.50

CMS:

2.75

PB Ratio

AEE:

2.15

CMS:

2.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEE:

$7.90B

CMS:

$7.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEE:

$4.88B

CMS:

$3.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

AEE:

$3.58B

CMS:

$3.15B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEE achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly higher than CMS's 8.89% return. Over the past 10 years, AEE has outperformed CMS with an annualized return of 12.53%, while CMS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.96% annualized return.


AEE

YTD

10.75%

1M

-0.64%

6M

9.03%

1Y

35.40%

5Y*

9.45%

10Y*

12.53%

CMS

YTD

8.89%

1M

-1.24%

6M

6.36%

1Y

16.54%

5Y*

8.22%

10Y*

10.96%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AEE vs. CMS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AEE is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AEE is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AEE is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AEE is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AEE is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AEE is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMS is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMS is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMS is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMS is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMS is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMS is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AEE vs. CMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ameren Corporation (AEE) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the CMS Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEE and CMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

AEE vs. CMS - Dividend Comparison

AEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than CMS's 2.96% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AEE
Ameren Corporation
2.77%3.01%3.48%2.65%2.47%2.56%2.50%2.83%3.01%3.27%3.83%3.49%
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
2.96%3.09%3.36%2.91%2.67%2.67%2.43%2.88%2.81%2.98%3.22%3.11%

Drawdowns

AEE vs. CMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEE drawdown since its inception was -60.57%, smaller than the maximum CMS drawdown of -91.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEE and CMS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

AEE vs. CMS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ameren Corporation (AEE) is 5.82%, while CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that AEE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AEE vs. CMS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ameren Corporation and CMS Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B2.40B20212022202320242025
2.10B
2.45B
(AEE) Total Revenue
(CMS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AEE vs. CMS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ameren Corporation and CMS Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
42.7%
(AEE) Gross Margin
(CMS) Gross Margin
AEE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ameren Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.10B and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CMS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 2.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.

AEE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ameren Corporation reported an operating income of 430.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

CMS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 494.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

AEE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ameren Corporation reported a net income of 289.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.

CMS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 304.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.