GSUI vs. PIPE
GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) and PIPE (Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSUI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate, while PIPE is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Invesco. GSUI is passively managed, while PIPE is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. GSUI charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PIPE.
Performance
GSUI vs. PIPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUI achieves a -48.29% return, which is significantly lower than PIPE's 27.15% return.
GSUI
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- -33.68%
- YTD
- -48.29%
- 6M
- -46.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIPE
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -3.91%
- YTD
- 27.15%
- 6M
- 27.22%
- 1Y
- 31.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSUI vs. PIPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | -48.29% | -42.99% |
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 27.15% | 2.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUI and PIPE is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUI vs. PIPE — Risk / Return Rank
GSUI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PIPE
GSUI vs. PIPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI) and Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSUI | PIPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSUI vs. PIPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUI drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than PIPE's maximum drawdown of -15.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUI and PIPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUI | PIPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -15.69% | -55.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.52% | -4.20% | -66.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.30% | -4.02% | -48.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.97% | — |
Volatility
GSUI vs. PIPE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUI | PIPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 106.72% | 14.54% | +92.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.72% | 18.64% | +88.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.72% | 18.64% | +88.08% |
GSUI vs. PIPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUI has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PIPE's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSUI vs. PIPE - Dividend Comparison
GSUI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PIPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.73% | 3.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSUI and PIPE have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PIPE.
PIPE has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 0.00% for GSUI.
GSUI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while PIPE is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for GSUI and 0.75% for PIPE.
Find the right allocation for GSUI and PIPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer