GSST vs. XTWO
GSST (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF) and XTWO (BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while XTWO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 2 Year Target Duration Index. GSST is actively managed, while XTWO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GSST returned 5.52%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for XTWO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSST charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for XTWO.
Performance
GSST vs. XTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSST achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than XTWO's 0.41% return.
GSST
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- —
XTWO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSST vs. XTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.55% | 5.20% | 6.01% | 6.08% | 0.70% |
XTWO BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 0.41% | 5.17% | 3.92% | 4.27% | 0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSST and XTWO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | 0.51 |
The correlation between GSST and XTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSST vs. XTWO — Risk / Return Rank
GSST
XTWO
GSST vs. XTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSST | XTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +12.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.94 | 1.52 | +2.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 29.99 | 3.78 | +26.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 185.54 | 13.59 | +171.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSST | XTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.98 | 2.52 | +5.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 5.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.78 | 1.74 | +2.05 |
Drawdowns
GSST vs. XTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSST drawdown since its inception was -3.51%, which is greater than XTWO's maximum drawdown of -1.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSST and XTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSST | XTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -1.73% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.15% | -0.91% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.25% | -1.18% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.38% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -0.40% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.25% | -0.23% |
Volatility
GSST vs. XTWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) is 0.13%, while BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) has a volatility of 0.36%. This indicates that GSST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSST | XTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.13% | 0.36% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.41% | 0.95% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58% | 1.37% | -0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.63% | 2.16% | -1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.86% | 2.16% | -1.30% |
GSST vs. XTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSST has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than XTWO's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSST vs. XTWO - Dividend Comparison
GSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than XTWO's 4.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.32% | 4.56% | 5.45% | 4.98% | 1.97% | 0.71% | 1.12% | 1.66% |
XTWO BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 4.05% | 4.24% | 4.54% | 4.07% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSST and XTWO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTWO has higher volatility (0.36%) compared to GSST (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSST dropped -3.51% vs XTWO's -1.73%.
On 3-year performance, GSST leads with 5.52% vs 4.12% for XTWO. On fees, XTWO is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, GSST has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GSST has performed better with a 5.52% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTWO is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for GSST.
GSST has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 4.05% for XTWO.
GSST is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while XTWO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for GSST and 0.05% for XTWO.
GSST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.98 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSST and XTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer