PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSST vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSST vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSST achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.75% return.


GSST

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.88%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*

SPYG

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.38%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.57%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
18.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSST vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GSST
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF
1.55%5.20%6.01%6.08%0.13%0.05%1.74%2.65%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.75%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%11.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GSST and SPYG is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019

0.03

The correlation between GSST and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSST vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSST
GSST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
GSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSST vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSSTSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+13.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.94

1.37

+2.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

29.99

2.48

+27.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

185.54

10.25

+175.29

GSST vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSST Sharpe Ratio is 7.98, which is higher than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSST and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSSTSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.98

2.12

+5.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.99

0.76

+5.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.78

0.35

+3.43

Drawdowns

GSST vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSST drawdown since its inception was -3.51%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSST and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSSTSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-67.63%

+64.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.15%

-13.76%

+13.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.25%

-22.14%

+21.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.19%

-32.67%

+31.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.13%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-24.33%

+24.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

3.32%

-3.30%

Volatility

GSST vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) is 0.13%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that GSST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSSTSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

4.35%

-4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.41%

12.46%

-12.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58%

16.06%

-15.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.63%

21.17%

-20.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.86%

20.64%

-19.78%

GSST vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSST has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSST vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

GSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSST
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF
4.32%4.56%5.45%4.98%1.97%0.71%1.12%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.47%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSST and SPYG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to GSST (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSST dropped -3.51% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 16.07% vs 3.75% for GSST. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, GSST has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 16.07% return vs 3.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for GSST.

GSST has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

GSST is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for GSST and 0.04% for SPYG.

GSST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.98 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSST and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer