PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSSC vs. SMMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSSC vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSSC achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 2.04% return.


GSSC

1D
-1.21%
1M
3.24%
YTD
13.55%
6M
13.10%
1Y
30.39%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*

SMMV

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.90%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSSC vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSSC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF
13.55%10.76%11.14%17.27%-16.81%24.13%16.02%23.14%-9.24%8.77%
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
2.04%6.42%18.29%5.63%-10.00%16.64%-2.88%24.21%1.15%6.99%

Correlation

The correlation between GSSC and SMMV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.86

The correlation between GSSC and SMMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GSSC vs. SMMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSSC
SMMV

Industrials

17.7%
13.8%

Financial Services

16.9%
10.9%

Healthcare

16.8%
17.1%

Technology

16.1%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
5.6%

Energy

4.8%
4.5%

Real Estate

4.3%
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
8.1%

Basic Materials

3.9%
2.0%

Communication Services

2.7%
5.4%

Utilities

2.2%
7.7%

Industrials

GSSC
17.7%
SMMV
13.8%

Financial Services

GSSC
16.9%
SMMV
10.9%

Healthcare

GSSC
16.8%
SMMV
17.1%

Technology

GSSC
16.1%
SMMV
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GSSC
10.6%
SMMV
5.6%

Energy

GSSC
4.8%
SMMV
4.5%

Real Estate

GSSC
4.3%
SMMV
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

GSSC
4.0%
SMMV
8.1%

Basic Materials

GSSC
3.9%
SMMV
2.0%

Communication Services

GSSC
2.7%
SMMV
5.4%

Utilities

GSSC
2.2%
SMMV
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSSC vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSSC
GSSC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GSSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SMMV
SMMV Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SMMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSSC vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSSCSMMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.11

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

0.89

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.64

2.82

+6.82

GSSC vs. SMMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the SMMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSSC and SMMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSSCSMMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

0.64

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.36

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.52

-0.07

Drawdowns

GSSC vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSSC drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, which is greater than SMMV's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSC and SMMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSSCSMMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.38%

-38.77%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-7.02%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

-13.68%

-12.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.81%

-18.00%

-9.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-4.44%

+3.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-5.10%

-3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.20%

+0.96%

Volatility

GSSC vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 2.27%. This indicates that GSSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSSCSMMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

2.27%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

6.30%

+6.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

9.73%

+8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.26%

13.50%

+7.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

15.69%

+7.33%

GSSC vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GSSC and SMMV have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSSC vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison

GSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than SMMV's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GSSC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF
1.07%1.17%1.42%1.33%1.31%1.00%0.94%1.24%1.21%0.73%0.00%
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
1.75%1.77%1.76%2.30%1.67%1.08%1.39%1.64%1.72%1.63%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSSC and SMMV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSSC has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to SMMV (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSC dropped -41.38% vs SMMV's -38.77%.

On 5-year performance, GSSC leads with 7.20% vs 4.87% for SMMV. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSSC has performed better with a 7.20% return vs 4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSSC and SMMV have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.07% for GSSC.

GSSC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares.

GSSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSSC and SMMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer