PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSSC vs. GVIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSSC vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSSC achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly lower than GVIP's 16.17% return.


GSSC

1D
-1.21%
1M
3.24%
YTD
13.55%
6M
13.10%
1Y
30.39%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*

GVIP

1D
-0.33%
1M
6.71%
YTD
16.17%
6M
18.08%
1Y
36.94%
3Y*
30.49%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSSC vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSSC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF
13.55%10.76%11.14%17.27%-16.81%24.13%16.02%23.14%-9.24%8.77%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
16.17%25.27%29.82%39.15%-31.95%11.86%44.12%30.21%-6.85%10.42%

Correlation

The correlation between GSSC and GVIP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.75

The correlation between GSSC and GVIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSSC vs. GVIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSSC
GVIP

Industrials

17.7%
9.5%

Financial Services

16.9%
15.8%

Healthcare

16.8%
8.0%

Technology

16.1%
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
8.0%

Energy

4.8%

-

Real Estate

4.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
1.2%

Basic Materials

3.9%

-

Communication Services

2.7%
11.5%

Utilities

2.2%
8.4%

Industrials

GSSC
17.7%
GVIP
9.5%

Financial Services

GSSC
16.9%
GVIP
15.8%

Healthcare

GSSC
16.8%
GVIP
8.0%

Technology

GSSC
16.1%
GVIP
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GSSC
10.6%
GVIP
8.0%

Energy

GSSC
4.8%
GVIP

-

Real Estate

GSSC
4.3%
GVIP

-

Consumer Defensive

GSSC
4.0%
GVIP
1.2%

Basic Materials

GSSC
3.9%
GVIP

-

Communication Services

GSSC
2.7%
GVIP
11.5%

Utilities

GSSC
2.2%
GVIP
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSSC vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSSC
GSSC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GSSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

GVIP
GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSSC vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSSCGVIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

2.71

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.64

11.81

-2.17

GSSC vs. GVIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the GVIP Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSSC and GVIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSSCGVIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.05

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.61

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.82

-0.37

Drawdowns

GSSC vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSSC drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, which is greater than GVIP's maximum drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSC and GVIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSSCGVIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.38%

-37.09%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-13.67%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

-23.29%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.81%

-37.09%

+9.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-0.33%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-7.59%

-1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.14%

+0.02%

Volatility

GSSC vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSSCGVIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

5.42%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

14.47%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

18.13%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.26%

21.29%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

21.65%

+1.37%

GSSC vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSSC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSSC vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison

GSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than GVIP's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GSSC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF
1.07%1.17%1.42%1.33%1.31%1.00%0.94%1.24%1.21%0.73%0.00%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
0.29%0.34%0.29%0.77%0.02%0.00%0.12%0.77%0.44%0.45%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSSC and GVIP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVIP has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to GSSC (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSC dropped -41.38% vs GVIP's -37.09%.

On 5-year performance, GVIP leads with 12.90% vs 7.20% for GSSC. On fees, GSSC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GSSC has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GVIP has performed better with a 12.90% return vs 7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSSC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.

GSSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.29% for GVIP.

GSSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while GVIP is Large Cap Growth Equities. GSSC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSSC and 0.45% for GVIP.

GVIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSSC and GVIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer