GSSC vs. GVIP
GSSC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF) and GVIP (Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSSC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while GVIP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSSC returned 7.20%/yr vs 12.90%/yr for GVIP. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSSC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GVIP.
Performance
GSSC vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSSC achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly lower than GVIP's 16.17% return.
GSSC
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 13.55%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 30.39%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
GVIP
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- YTD
- 16.17%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 36.94%
- 3Y*
- 30.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- —
GSSC vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 13.55% | 10.76% | 11.14% | 17.27% | -16.81% | 24.13% | 16.02% | 23.14% | -9.24% | 8.77% |
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 16.17% | 25.27% | 29.82% | 39.15% | -31.95% | 11.86% | 44.12% | 30.21% | -6.85% | 10.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSSC and GVIP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017 | 0.75 |
The correlation between GSSC and GVIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSSC vs. GVIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSSC
GVIP
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
GSSC
GVIP
Financial Services
GSSC
GVIP
Healthcare
GSSC
GVIP
Technology
GSSC
GVIP
Consumer Cyclical
GSSC
GVIP
Energy
GSSC
GVIP
-
Real Estate
GSSC
GVIP
-
Consumer Defensive
GSSC
GVIP
Basic Materials
GSSC
GVIP
-
Communication Services
GSSC
GVIP
Utilities
GSSC
GVIP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSSC vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank
GSSC
GVIP
GSSC vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSSC | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 2.71 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 11.81 | -2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSSC | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 2.05 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.61 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.82 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
GSSC vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSSC drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, which is greater than GVIP's maximum drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSC and GVIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSSC | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -37.09% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -13.67% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.05% | -23.29% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.81% | -37.09% | +9.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -0.33% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -7.59% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 3.14% | +0.02% |
Volatility
GSSC vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSSC | GVIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 5.42% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.82% | 14.47% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.58% | 18.13% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 21.29% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 21.65% | +1.37% |
GSSC vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSSC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSSC vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison
GSSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than GVIP's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.07% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 0.94% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 0.73% | 0.00% |
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 0.29% | 0.34% | 0.29% | 0.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.77% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSSC and GVIP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVIP has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to GSSC (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSC dropped -41.38% vs GVIP's -37.09%.
On 5-year performance, GVIP leads with 12.90% vs 7.20% for GSSC. On fees, GSSC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GSSC has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GVIP has performed better with a 12.90% return vs 7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSSC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.
GSSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.29% for GVIP.
GSSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while GVIP is Large Cap Growth Equities. GSSC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GSSC and 0.45% for GVIP.
GVIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSSC and GVIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer