PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSRTX vs. GSBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSRTX vs. GSBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund (GSRTX) and Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSRTX achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly higher than GSBFX's 4.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GSRTX has underperformed GSBFX with an annualized return of 5.49%, while GSBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.97% annualized return.


GSRTX

1D
0.18%
1M
2.28%
YTD
6.36%
6M
7.04%
1Y
14.54%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
5.49%

GSBFX

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.95%
YTD
4.73%
6M
5.31%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
10.76%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
6.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSRTX vs. GSBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSRTX
Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund
6.36%9.55%6.93%10.69%-6.36%6.32%3.55%10.66%-2.57%7.25%
GSBFX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund
4.73%10.42%9.32%9.64%-9.53%10.50%9.53%19.38%-4.92%7.94%

Correlation

The correlation between GSRTX and GSBFX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.81

The correlation between GSRTX and GSBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSRTX vs. GSBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSRTX
GSRTX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GSRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GSRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

GSBFX
GSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSRTX vs. GSBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund (GSRTX) and Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSRTXGSBFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

2.47

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.67

3.55

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.47

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

3.14

+0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.93

13.71

+1.21

GSRTX vs. GSBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSRTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the GSBFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSRTX and GSBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSRTXGSBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.47

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.74

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.88

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.70

-0.03

Drawdowns

GSRTX vs. GSBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSRTX drawdown since its inception was -13.27%, smaller than the maximum GSBFX drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSRTX and GSBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSRTXGSBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.27%

-37.04%

+23.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.35%

-4.44%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.51%

-8.14%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.96%

-15.94%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.27%

-23.42%

+10.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.04%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-4.18%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

1.02%

-0.02%

Volatility

GSRTX vs. GSBFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund (GSRTX) is 1.43%, while Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) has a volatility of 1.71%. This indicates that GSRTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSRTXGSBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

1.71%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.54%

4.44%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.76%

5.48%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.70%

7.41%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.48%

7.99%

-1.51%

GSRTX vs. GSBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSRTX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GSBFX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSRTX vs. GSBFX - Dividend Comparison

GSRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than GSBFX's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSBFX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund
5.11%4.39%5.12%3.41%4.10%6.66%3.05%3.52%3.98%3.52%3.78%3.93%
GSRTX
Goldman Sachs Absolute Return Tracker Fund
1.94%2.07%1.05%2.69%5.18%9.00%0.61%3.52%2.62%3.51%0.54%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSRTX and GSBFX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSBFX has higher volatility (1.71%) compared to GSRTX (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSRTX dropped -13.27% vs GSBFX's -37.04%.

GSRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSRTX and GSBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer