PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSPY vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSPY vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSPY achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -30.44% return.


GSPY

1D
0.87%
1M
1.25%
6M
9.70%
YTD
11.59%
1Y
24.15%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.97%

MSTZ

1D
8.95%
1M
7.38%
6M
-24.16%
YTD
-30.44%
1Y
159.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-86.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$111.53K$112.18K$139.32K
$101.73M$133.33M$177.41M

GSPY vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GSPY
Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF
11.59%18.28%4.51%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-30.44%-38.95%-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GSPY and MSTZ is -0.46, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024

-0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSPY vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSPY
GSPY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSPY vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSPYMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.44

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

4.53

+6.38

GSPY vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSPY Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSPY and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSPY vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSPY drawdown since its inception was -23.30%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPY and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSPYMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.30%

-99.38%

+76.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-84.89%

+76.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-97.63%

+97.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-94.63%

+89.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

45.62%

-43.59%

Volatility

GSPY vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) is 3.50%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 37.86%. This indicates that GSPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSPYMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

37.86%

-34.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

134.52%

-124.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

150.23%

-137.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.65%

169.87%

-153.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.26%

169.87%

-153.61%

GSPY vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSPY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSPY vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

GSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GSPY
Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF
2.34%2.61%0.84%1.06%1.25%0.23%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSPY and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (37.86%) compared to GSPY (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSPY dropped -23.30% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 159.07% vs 24.15% for GSPY. On fees, GSPY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GSPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 159.07% return vs 24.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSPY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

GSPY has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

GSPY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Gotham and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GSPY and 1.05% for MSTZ.

GSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSPY and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer