GSPY vs. TMFC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GSPY (Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF) and TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gotham, while TMFC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool 100 Index. GSPY is actively managed, while TMFC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSPY returned 13.44%/yr vs 14.51%/yr for TMFC. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

GSPY vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSPY achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly higher than TMFC's 5.63% return.

GSPY

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 9.89%
• 6M: 9.56%
• 1Y: 27.59%
• 3Y*: 21.18%
• 5Y*: 13.44%
• 10Y*: —

TMFC

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: 5.63%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: 23.51%
• 3Y*: 24.09%
• 5Y*: 14.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSPY vs. TMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GSPY Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF	9.89%	18.28%	23.58%	26.01%	-17.07%	27.53%	0.25%
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	5.63%	19.55%	35.17%	47.04%	-30.86%	25.30%	0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GSPY and TMFC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2020	0.93

The correlation between GSPY and TMFC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSPY vs. TMFC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GSPY	TMFC
Technology	38.5%	44.5%
Financial Services	11.4%	12.1%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	11.1%
Communication Services	10.1%	16.6%
Healthcare	8.8%	4.4%
Industrials	8.0%	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	3.8%
Energy	2.7%	1.7%
Real Estate	2.1%	0.9%
Basic Materials	1.2%	0.6%
Utilities	0.7%	0.4%

Return for Risk

GSPY vs. TMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSPY

GSPY Risk / Return Rank: 69
GSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
GSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 69
GSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
GSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 76

TMFC

TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 45
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSPY vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSPY	TMFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.66	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	2.28	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.29	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	1.87	+1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.11	6.78	+7.33

GSPY vs. TMFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSPY and TMFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSPY vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSPY drawdown since its inception was -23.30%, smaller than the maximum TMFC drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPY and TMFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSPY	TMFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.30%	-33.06%	+9.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.62%	-12.64%	+4.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.67%	-20.06%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.30%	-33.06%	+9.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.82%	-3.67%	+1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.73%	-6.75%	+2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	3.48%	-1.52%

Volatility

GSPY vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) is 4.35%, while Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that GSPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSPY	TMFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	5.31%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.58%	11.15%	-1.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.82%	14.24%	-1.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.63%	20.48%	-3.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.34%	22.00%	-5.66%

GSPY vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GSPY and TMFC have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

GSPY vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

GSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than TMFC's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GSPY Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF	2.38%	2.61%	0.84%	1.06%	1.25%	0.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	0.14%	0.14%	0.40%	0.26%	0.27%	0.23%	0.42%	0.50%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSPY and TMFC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, GSPY and TMFC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GSPY or TMFC?

TMFC has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to GSPY (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSPY dropped -23.30% vs TMFC's -33.06%.

Which ETF is better, GSPY or TMFC?

On 5-year performance, TMFC leads with 14.51% vs 13.44% for GSPY. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, GSPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSPY or TMFC?

Over the 5-year period, TMFC has performed better with a 14.51% return vs 13.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSPY or TMFC?

GSPY and TMFC have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSPY or TMFC?

GSPY has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.14% for TMFC.

What is the main difference between GSPY and TMFC?

GSPY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TMFC is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Gotham and Motley Fool.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.