GSPY vs. TMFC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC).

GSPY and TMFC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSPY is an actively managed fund by Gotham. It was launched on Dec 28, 2020. TMFC is a passively managed fund by Motley Fool that tracks the performance of the Motley Fool 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2018.

Performance

GSPY vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GSPY vs. TMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GSPY Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF	-3.92%	18.28%	23.58%	26.01%	-17.07%	27.53%	0.58%
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	-8.08%	19.55%	35.17%	47.04%	-30.86%	25.30%	0.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSPY achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly higher than TMFC's -8.08% return.

GSPY

• 1D: 2.62%
• 1M: -5.00%
• YTD: -3.92%
• 6M: -0.83%
• 1Y: 18.09%
• 3Y*: 18.14%
• 5Y*: 11.69%
• 10Y*: —

TMFC

• 1D: 2.97%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: -8.08%
• 6M: -6.33%
• 1Y: 18.78%
• 3Y*: 23.36%
• 5Y*: 13.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSPY vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GSPY and TMFC have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

GSPY

Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF

TMFC

Motley Fool 100 Index ETF

Return for Risk

GSPY vs. TMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSPY

GSPY Risk / Return Rank: 62
GSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
GSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
GSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
GSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 71

TMFC

TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 60
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 61
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSPY vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSPY	TMFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	0.93	+0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	1.47	+0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.21	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	1.52	-0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.18	5.42	+1.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSPY vs. TMFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSPY Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSPY and TMFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSPY	TMFC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98	0.93	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.64	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.74	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between GSPY and TMFC is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GSPY vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

GSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than TMFC's 0.16% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GSPY Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF	2.72%	2.61%	0.84%	1.06%	1.25%	0.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	0.16%	0.14%	0.40%	0.26%	0.27%	0.23%	0.42%	0.50%	0.61%

Drawdowns

GSPY vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSPY drawdown since its inception was -23.30%, smaller than the maximum TMFC drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPY and TMFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSPY	TMFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.30%	-33.06%	+9.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.38%	-12.64%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.30%	-33.06%	+9.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.23%	-9.95%	+3.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.89%	-6.88%	+1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	3.54%	-0.95%

Volatility

GSPY vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF (GSPY) is 5.04%, while Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that GSPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSPY	TMFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	5.76%	-0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	10.52%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.56%	20.21%	-1.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.57%	20.43%	-3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.47%	22.14%	-5.67%