PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSPKX vs. GLEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSPKX vs. GLEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSPKX achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly lower than GLEIX's 22.15% return.


GSPKX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.86%
YTD
9.85%
6M
9.24%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
20.27%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
13.27%

GLEIX

1D
1.08%
1M
-5.53%
YTD
22.15%
6M
22.06%
1Y
25.94%
3Y*
32.87%
5Y*
22.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSPKX vs. GLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
9.85%13.60%29.55%21.39%-15.20%22.79%14.15%25.11%-6.29%2.86%
GLEIX
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund
22.15%5.30%58.18%15.08%18.96%38.31%-17.46%16.95%-15.17%6.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GSPKX and GLEIX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017

0.50

The correlation between GSPKX and GLEIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSPKX vs. GLEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSPKX
GSPKX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GSPKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSPKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSPKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GSPKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSPKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

GLEIX
GLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSPKX vs. GLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSPKXGLEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.29

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.43

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.41

8.09

+7.33

GSPKX vs. GLEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSPKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the GLEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSPKX and GLEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSPKX vs. GLEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSPKX drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, smaller than the maximum GLEIX drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPKX and GLEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSPKXGLEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.90%

-59.27%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-7.29%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.51%

-17.07%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.34%

-21.89%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-5.81%

+5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-8.52%

+2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

3.08%

-1.52%

Volatility

GSPKX vs. GLEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) is 3.47%, while Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that GSPKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSPKXGLEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

5.30%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

11.29%

-2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.24%

14.73%

-4.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

20.58%

-4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.92%

25.42%

-8.50%

GSPKX vs. GLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSPKX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than GLEIX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSPKX vs. GLEIX - Dividend Comparison

GSPKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, less than GLEIX's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLEIX
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund
8.18%10.00%25.43%10.22%4.70%8.41%4.17%4.83%3.54%0.68%0.00%0.00%
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
6.02%6.32%12.77%6.48%6.33%6.01%7.19%6.86%7.95%6.13%5.63%6.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSPKX and GLEIX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLEIX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to GSPKX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSPKX dropped -51.90% vs GLEIX's -59.27%.

GSPKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSPKX and GLEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer