GSPKX vs. MRGAX
GSPKX (Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund) and MRGAX (MFS Core Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GSPKX returned 13.27%/yr vs 14.36%/yr for MRGAX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSPKX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for MRGAX.
Performance
GSPKX vs. MRGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSPKX achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than MRGAX's 6.15% return. Over the past 10 years, GSPKX has underperformed MRGAX with an annualized return of 13.27%, while MRGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.36% annualized return.
GSPKX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 23.12%
- 3Y*
- 20.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.27%
MRGAX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 16.94%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.36%
GSPKX vs. MRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSPKX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund | 9.85% | 13.60% | 29.55% | 21.39% | -15.20% | 22.79% | 14.15% | 25.11% | -6.29% | 15.32% |
MRGAX MFS Core Equity Fund | 6.15% | 12.33% | 20.01% | 22.88% | -17.24% | 25.26% | 18.56% | 34.66% | -4.12% | 23.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSPKX and MRGAX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006 | 0.96 |
The correlation between GSPKX and MRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSPKX vs. MRGAX — Risk / Return Rank
GSPKX
MRGAX
GSPKX vs. MRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) and MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSPKX | MRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.26 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 1.89 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.41 | 7.80 | +7.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSPKX vs. MRGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSPKX drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, roughly equal to the maximum MRGAX drawdown of -54.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPKX and MRGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSPKX | MRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.90% | -54.04% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | -9.53% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.51% | -19.22% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.34% | -23.08% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.70% | -33.41% | +0.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -2.03% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -8.26% | +2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 2.31% | -0.75% |
Volatility
GSPKX vs. MRGAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) is 3.47%, while MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that GSPKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSPKX | MRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 4.46% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 9.84% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.24% | 12.48% | -2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 16.86% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 17.83% | -0.91% |
GSPKX vs. MRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSPKX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than MRGAX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSPKX vs. MRGAX - Dividend Comparison
GSPKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, less than MRGAX's 12.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSPKX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund | 6.02% | 6.32% | 12.77% | 6.48% | 6.33% | 6.01% | 7.19% | 6.86% | 7.95% | 6.13% | 5.63% | 6.29% |
MRGAX MFS Core Equity Fund | 12.81% | 13.60% | 8.21% | 2.54% | 3.83% | 7.28% | 1.54% | 3.20% | 11.09% | 6.27% | 3.65% | 11.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GSPKX and MRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MRGAX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to GSPKX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSPKX dropped -51.90% vs MRGAX's -54.04%.
GSPKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSPKX and MRGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer