GSLC vs. GHYB
GSLC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and GHYB (Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSLC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while GHYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSLC returned 11.78%/yr vs 3.95%/yr for GHYB. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSLC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for GHYB.
Performance
GSLC vs. GHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSLC achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly higher than GHYB's 1.55% return.
GSLC
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 19.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.65%
GHYB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
GSLC vs. GHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 5.86% | 16.17% | 24.21% | 25.09% | -18.71% | 27.17% | 19.02% | 30.74% | -4.07% | 9.77% |
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.55% | 9.38% | 7.76% | 12.13% | -11.02% | 3.21% | 6.38% | 14.55% | -2.01% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSLC and GHYB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017 | 0.69 |
The correlation between GSLC and GHYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSLC vs. GHYB — Risk / Return Rank
GSLC
GHYB
GSLC vs. GHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSLC | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 2.41 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.86 | 10.98 | -2.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSLC vs. GHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSLC drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, which is greater than GHYB's maximum drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC and GHYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSLC | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.69% | -21.48% | -12.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.49% | -2.67% | -6.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.66% | -4.66% | -14.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.90% | -16.08% | -8.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -0.10% | -2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.38% | -2.55% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 0.59% | +1.60% |
Volatility
GSLC vs. GHYB - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) at 0.93%. This indicates that GSLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GHYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSLC | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 0.93% | +3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 2.77% | +6.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 3.52% | +8.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 7.70% | +9.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 8.26% | +9.44% |
GSLC vs. GHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSLC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GHYB's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSLC vs. GHYB - Dividend Comparison
GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than GHYB's 6.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.79% | 7.00% | 6.65% | 6.20% | 5.67% | 4.46% | 4.75% | 5.57% | 5.68% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.95% | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.61% | 1.06% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSLC and GHYB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSLC has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to GHYB (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSLC dropped -33.69% vs GHYB's -21.48%.
On 5-year performance, GSLC leads with 11.78% vs 3.95% for GHYB. On fees, GSLC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GHYB has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSLC has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSLC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for GHYB.
GHYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.79%, compared with 0.95% for GSLC.
GSLC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GHYB is High Yield Bonds. GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while GHYB tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSLC and 0.34% for GHYB.
GHYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSLC and GHYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer