PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSK vs. BCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GSK vs. BCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GSK plc (GSK) and Barclays PLC (BCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSK achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than BCS's 11.06% return. Over the past 10 years, GSK has underperformed BCS with an annualized return of 3.94%, while BCS has yielded a comparatively higher 16.81% annualized return.


GSK

1D
1.48%
1M
0.22%
6M
8.27%
YTD
5.20%
1Y
45.35%
3Y*
16.88%
5Y*
4.91%
10Y*
3.94%
ALL TIME*
8.43%

BCS

1D
2.53%
1M
6.16%
6M
10.28%
YTD
11.06%
1Y
49.74%
3Y*
54.09%
5Y*
29.35%
10Y*
16.81%
ALL TIME*
7.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSK vs. BCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSK
GSK plc
5.20%51.23%-5.14%9.71%-33.41%26.74%-17.72%29.24%13.79%-2.97%
BCS
Barclays PLC
11.06%96.49%76.26%6.01%-21.90%31.71%-12.84%31.90%-29.25%0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GSK and BCS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 1986

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GSK:

$101.70B

BCS:

$94.17B

EPS

GSK:

£2.85

BCS:

£2.07

PE Ratio

GSK:

13.25

BCS:

10.04

PEG Ratio

GSK:

0.89

BCS:

1.82

PS Ratio

GSK:

2.36

BCS:

2.53

PB Ratio

GSK:

3.27

BCS:

0.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

GSK:

£32.78B

BCS:

£28.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GSK:

£23.87B

BCS:

£26.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

GSK:

£11.30B

BCS:

£9.15B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSK vs. BCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSK
GSK Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSK Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSK Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BCS
BCS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSK vs. BCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GSK plc (GSK) and Barclays PLC (BCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSKBCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

1.91

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.55

5.38

+0.17

GSK vs. BCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSK Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the BCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSK and BCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSK vs. BCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSK drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, smaller than the maximum BCS drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSK and BCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSKBCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.70%

-94.36%

+38.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.63%

-26.20%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.46%

-26.20%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.10%

-48.14%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.10%

-66.10%

+16.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.67%

-17.41%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.86%

-38.37%

+19.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.20%

9.27%

-1.07%

Volatility

GSK vs. BCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GSK plc (GSK) is 8.73%, while Barclays PLC (BCS) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that GSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSKBCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.73%

9.28%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.74%

25.24%

-5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.05%

29.86%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.34%

33.98%

-8.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.95%

36.35%

-13.40%

Dividends

GSK vs. BCS - Dividend Comparison

GSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than BCS's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCS
Barclays PLC
1.67%1.70%3.13%4.86%4.18%1.61%3.91%3.68%3.21%1.37%2.26%2.95%
GSK
GSK plc
3.40%3.42%4.60%3.75%5.47%4.99%5.59%4.35%5.65%5.83%6.86%5.93%

Financials

GSK vs. BCS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GSK plc and Barclays PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
7.63B
8.16B
(GSK) Total Revenue
(BCS) Total Revenue
Values in GBP except per share items

GSK vs. BCS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GSK plc and Barclays PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
75.4%
100.0%
Portfolio components
GSK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, GSK plc reported a gross profit of 5.75B and revenue of 7.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.4%.

BCS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Barclays PLC reported a gross profit of 8.16B and revenue of 8.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

GSK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, GSK plc reported an operating income of 2.29B and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.

BCS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Barclays PLC reported an operating income of 2.81B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.5%.

GSK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, GSK plc reported a net income of 1.74B and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.

BCS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Barclays PLC reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in a net margin of 26.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GSK and BCS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCS has higher volatility (9.28%) compared to GSK (8.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSK dropped -55.70% vs BCS's -94.36%.

GSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSK and BCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer