GSJY vs. YCS
GSJY (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - GSJY is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSJY returned 9.28%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for YCS. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. GSJY charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
GSJY vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, GSJY has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 9.28%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.
GSJY
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
YCS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 23.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
GSJY vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 13.29% | 26.22% | 8.89% | 19.18% | -16.15% | 0.41% | 13.81% | 18.29% | -11.56% | 25.50% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.17% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSJY and YCS is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2016 | -0.09 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GSJY and YCS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.09 to -0.38, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSJY vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
GSJY
YCS
GSJY vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSJY | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 3.97 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.09 | 12.40 | -5.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSJY | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 1.92 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 1.12 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.65 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.33 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
GSJY vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSJY | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -49.56% | +17.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -8.30% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.96% | -23.05% | +8.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.53% | -27.32% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.53% | -27.32% | -5.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | 0.00% | -2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -19.93% | +12.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 2.66% | +1.55% |
Volatility
GSJY vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that GSJY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSJY | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 2.75% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.17% | 12.32% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 17.27% | +2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 21.10% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 19.01% | -1.97% |
GSJY vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSJY vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 1.75% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 2.11% | 2.13% | 1.73% | 1.22% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 1.70% | 2.09% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSJY and YCS have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSJY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 12.34% vs 9.28% for GSJY. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
GSJY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
GSJY is categorized as Japan Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSJY and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer