GSJY vs. JAPN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GSJY (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF) and JAPN (Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF) are both Japan Equities funds. GSJY is passively managed, while JAPN is actively managed. Over the past year, GSJY returned 29.76% vs -16.72% for JAPN. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSJY charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for JAPN.

Performance

GSJY vs. JAPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly higher than JAPN's -13.33% return.

GSJY

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 4.99%
• YTD: 13.29%
• 6M: 15.13%
• 1Y: 29.76%
• 3Y*: 18.00%
• 5Y*: 8.80%
• 10Y*: 9.28%

JAPN

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: -13.33%
• 6M: -13.01%
• 1Y: -16.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSJY vs. JAPN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF	13.29%	17.59%
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF	-13.33%	2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GSJY and JAPN is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	0.62

The correlation between GSJY and JAPN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GSJY vs. JAPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSJY

GSJY Risk / Return Rank: 44
GSJY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
GSJY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GSJY Omega Ratio Rank: 45
GSJY Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
GSJY Martin Ratio Rank: 44

JAPN

JAPN Risk / Return Rank: 2
JAPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
JAPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
JAPN Omega Ratio Rank: 2
JAPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
JAPN Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSJY vs. JAPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSJY	JAPN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	-0.90	+2.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	-1.18	+3.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.86	+0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	-0.70	+2.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.09	-1.34	+8.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSJY vs. JAPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSJY Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the JAPN Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSJY and JAPN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSJY	JAPN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	-0.90	+2.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	-0.54	+1.09

Drawdowns

GSJY vs. JAPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than JAPN's maximum drawdown of -23.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and JAPN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSJY	JAPN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.53%	-23.94%	-8.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.08%	-23.94%	+9.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.62%	-22.90%	+20.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.58%	-9.47%	+1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.21%	12.54%	-8.33%

Volatility

GSJY vs. JAPN - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSJY	JAPN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.21%	4.33%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.17%	15.41%	-0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.48%	18.77%	+0.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.07%	19.24%	-1.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.04%	19.24%	-2.20%

GSJY vs. JAPN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JAPN's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSJY vs. JAPN - Dividend Comparison

GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than JAPN's 0.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF	1.75%	1.99%	1.64%	2.11%	2.13%	1.73%	1.22%	2.79%	3.28%	1.70%	2.09%
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF	0.28%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSJY and JAPN in my portfolio?

GSJY and JAPN have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSJY or JAPN?

JAPN has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to GSJY (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs JAPN's -23.94%.

Which ETF is better, GSJY or JAPN?

On 1-year performance, GSJY leads with 29.76% vs -16.72% for JAPN. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSJY has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSJY or JAPN?

Over the 1-year period, GSJY has performed better with a 29.76% return vs -16.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSJY or JAPN?

GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for JAPN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSJY or JAPN?

GSJY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.28% for JAPN.

What is the main difference between GSJY and JAPN?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 0.85% for JAPN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSJY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.