GSJY vs. GBIL
GSJY (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSJY is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while GBIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSJY returned 9.38%/yr vs 3.43%/yr for GBIL. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GSJY charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.
Performance
GSJY vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly higher than GBIL's 2.00% return.
GSJY
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 7.61%
- YTD
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 17.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.18%
GBIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 3.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.54%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $54.62M | $52.46M | $69.99M | |
| $176.08K | $192.71K | $274.31K |
GSJY vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 14.32% | 26.22% | 8.89% | 19.18% | -16.15% | 0.41% | 13.81% | 18.29% | -11.56% | 25.50% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 2.00% | 4.12% | 5.24% | 4.91% | 1.05% | -0.08% | 0.79% | 2.31% | 1.78% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSJY and GBIL is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSJY vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank
GSJY
GBIL
GSJY vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSJY | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -148.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 92.87 | -91.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 187.90 | -185.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.76 | 2,250.52 | -2,243.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSJY vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and GBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSJY | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -0.76% | -31.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -0.02% | -14.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.96% | -0.76% | -14.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.53% | -0.76% | -31.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | 0.00% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.52% | -0.04% | -7.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 0.00% | +4.39% |
Volatility
GSJY vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) has a higher volatility of 6.92% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that GSJY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSJY | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.92% | 0.06% | +6.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.21% | 0.14% | +17.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.50% | 0.21% | +20.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 0.58% | +17.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 0.47% | +16.69% |
GSJY vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSJY vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison
GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than GBIL's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 3.68% | 4.02% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% |
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 2.03% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 2.11% | 2.13% | 1.73% | 1.22% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 1.70% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSJY and GBIL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSJY has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to GBIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs GBIL's -0.76%.
On 5-year performance, GSJY leads with 9.38% vs 3.43% for GBIL. On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSJY has performed better with a 9.38% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSJY.
GBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 2.03% for GSJY.
GSJY is categorized as Japan Equities, while GBIL is Government Bonds. GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while GBIL tracks FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 0.12% for GBIL.
GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.10 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSJY and GBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer