PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSJY vs. FJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSJY vs. FJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than FJP's 14.28% return. Over the past 10 years, GSJY has outperformed FJP with an annualized return of 9.28%, while FJP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.


GSJY

1D
0.75%
1M
4.99%
YTD
13.29%
6M
15.13%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
9.28%

FJP

1D
0.00%
1M
2.90%
YTD
14.28%
6M
15.85%
1Y
33.53%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*
7.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSJY vs. FJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
13.29%26.22%8.89%19.18%-16.15%0.41%13.81%18.29%-11.56%25.50%
FJP
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund
14.28%33.60%5.80%23.00%-12.83%-1.13%3.60%7.72%-18.60%27.63%

Correlation

The correlation between GSJY and FJP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2016

0.82

The correlation between GSJY and FJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSJY vs. FJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSJY
FJP

Industrials

26.3%
45.0%

Financial Services

18.1%
5.6%

Technology

17.5%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
12.0%

Communication Services

6.0%
0.7%

Healthcare

5.8%
3.6%

Energy

3.4%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.4%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
0.8%

Real Estate

1.5%
3.5%

Utilities

1.4%
6.1%

Industrials

GSJY
26.3%
FJP
45.0%

Financial Services

GSJY
18.1%
FJP
5.6%

Technology

GSJY
17.5%
FJP
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GSJY
13.4%
FJP
12.0%

Communication Services

GSJY
6.0%
FJP
0.7%

Healthcare

GSJY
5.8%
FJP
3.6%

Energy

GSJY
3.4%
FJP
4.2%

Basic Materials

GSJY
3.4%
FJP
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

GSJY
3.3%
FJP
0.8%

Real Estate

GSJY
1.5%
FJP
3.5%

Utilities

GSJY
1.4%
FJP
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSJY vs. FJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSJY
GSJY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GSJY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSJY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSJY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GSJY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSJY Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FJP
FJP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJP Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSJY vs. FJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSJYFJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.33

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.09

7.20

-0.11

GSJY vs. FJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSJY Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the FJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSJY and FJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSJYFJPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.63

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.53

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.40

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.32

+0.22

Drawdowns

GSJY vs. FJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum FJP drawdown of -41.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and FJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSJYFJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-41.51%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-14.43%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.96%

-17.02%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.53%

-31.88%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

-41.51%

+8.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-6.34%

+3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-11.46%

+3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

4.67%

-0.46%

Volatility

GSJY vs. FJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) is 4.21%, while First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that GSJY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSJYFJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

6.51%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.17%

16.87%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

20.70%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

20.35%

-2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

18.88%

-1.84%

GSJY vs. FJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FJP's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSJY vs. FJP - Dividend Comparison

GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than FJP's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJP
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund
2.49%2.68%3.18%3.49%2.21%2.43%0.99%2.80%1.54%1.29%1.46%0.85%
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
1.75%1.99%1.64%2.11%2.13%1.73%1.22%2.79%3.28%1.70%2.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSJY and FJP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FJP has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to GSJY (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs FJP's -41.51%.

On 10-year performance, GSJY leads with 9.28% vs 7.48% for FJP. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSJY has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GSJY has performed better with a 9.28% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FJP.

FJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.75% for GSJY.

GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while FJP tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Japan Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 0.80% for FJP.

FJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSJY and FJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer