PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSJY vs. EZJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSJY vs. EZJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly lower than EZJ's 24.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GSJY has underperformed EZJ with an annualized return of 9.08%, while EZJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.06% annualized return.


GSJY

1D
-1.73%
1M
1.03%
6M
6.67%
YTD
12.95%
1Y
31.55%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
9.08%

EZJ

1D
-4.17%
1M
0.10%
6M
12.24%
YTD
24.78%
1Y
60.50%
3Y*
23.99%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSJY vs. EZJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
12.95%26.22%8.89%19.18%-16.15%0.41%13.81%18.29%-11.56%25.50%
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
24.78%42.72%3.31%30.78%-38.23%-1.96%22.21%33.76%-30.99%49.10%

Correlation

The correlation between GSJY and EZJ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2016

0.90

The correlation between GSJY and EZJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSJY vs. EZJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSJY
EZJ

Industrials

24.9%
24.5%

Technology

20.2%
20.8%

Financial Services

18.1%
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
11.9%

Communication Services

6.4%
8.8%

Healthcare

4.9%
5.9%

Basic Materials

3.7%
3.0%

Energy

3.4%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
3.5%

Utilities

1.5%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.9%

Industrials

GSJY
24.9%
EZJ
24.5%

Technology

GSJY
20.2%
EZJ
20.8%

Financial Services

GSJY
18.1%
EZJ
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GSJY
12.7%
EZJ
11.9%

Communication Services

GSJY
6.4%
EZJ
8.8%

Healthcare

GSJY
4.9%
EZJ
5.9%

Basic Materials

GSJY
3.7%
EZJ
3.0%

Energy

GSJY
3.4%
EZJ
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

GSJY
3.1%
EZJ
3.5%

Utilities

GSJY
1.5%
EZJ
1.0%

Real Estate

GSJY
1.2%
EZJ
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSJY vs. EZJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSJY
GSJY Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GSJY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSJY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSJY Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GSJY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSJY Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

EZJ
EZJ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EZJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
EZJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSJY vs. EZJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSJYEZJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.27

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

6.82

+0.56

GSJY vs. EZJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSJY Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the EZJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSJY and EZJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSJY vs. EZJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum EZJ drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and EZJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSJYEZJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-58.63%

+26.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-26.78%

+12.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.96%

-31.48%

+16.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.53%

-58.63%

+26.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

-58.63%

+26.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

-9.52%

+5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.54%

-21.20%

+13.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

8.90%

-4.61%

Volatility

GSJY vs. EZJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) is 6.77%, while ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a volatility of 15.81%. This indicates that GSJY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSJYEZJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

15.81%

-9.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.73%

34.90%

-18.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

42.43%

-22.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.28%

37.22%

-18.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

34.69%

-17.60%

GSJY vs. EZJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EZJ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSJY vs. EZJ - Dividend Comparison

GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than EZJ's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
1.90%1.13%2.09%1.11%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.24%4.49%0.00%0.00%
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
2.05%1.99%1.64%2.11%2.13%1.73%1.22%2.79%3.28%1.70%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, GSJY and EZJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EZJ has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to GSJY (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs EZJ's -58.63%.

On 10-year performance, EZJ leads with 10.06% vs 9.08% for GSJY. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSJY has been the lower-risk option at 6.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EZJ has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 9.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.

GSJY has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.90% for EZJ.

GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 0.95% for EZJ.

GSJY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSJY and EZJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer