PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSJY vs. DFJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSJY vs. DFJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly higher than DFJ's 9.06% return. Over the past 10 years, GSJY has outperformed DFJ with an annualized return of 9.28%, while DFJ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.


GSJY

1D
0.75%
1M
4.99%
YTD
13.29%
6M
15.13%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
9.28%

DFJ

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.01%
YTD
9.06%
6M
12.58%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
8.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSJY vs. DFJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
13.29%26.22%8.89%19.18%-16.15%0.41%13.81%18.29%-11.56%25.50%
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
9.06%31.90%2.80%21.81%-9.00%0.38%1.29%16.98%-18.53%32.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GSJY and DFJ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2016

0.83

The correlation between GSJY and DFJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GSJY vs. DFJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSJY
DFJ

Industrials

26.3%
27.0%

Financial Services

18.1%
13.3%

Technology

17.5%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
16.1%

Communication Services

6.0%
1.5%

Healthcare

5.8%
4.1%

Energy

3.4%
0.6%

Basic Materials

3.4%
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
7.1%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.9%

Utilities

1.4%
1.6%

Industrials

GSJY
26.3%
DFJ
27.0%

Financial Services

GSJY
18.1%
DFJ
13.3%

Technology

GSJY
17.5%
DFJ
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GSJY
13.4%
DFJ
16.1%

Communication Services

GSJY
6.0%
DFJ
1.5%

Healthcare

GSJY
5.8%
DFJ
4.1%

Energy

GSJY
3.4%
DFJ
0.6%

Basic Materials

GSJY
3.4%
DFJ
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

GSJY
3.3%
DFJ
7.1%

Real Estate

GSJY
1.5%
DFJ
2.9%

Utilities

GSJY
1.4%
DFJ
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSJY vs. DFJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSJY
GSJY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GSJY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSJY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSJY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GSJY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSJY Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

DFJ
DFJ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DFJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DFJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSJY vs. DFJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSJYDFJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.07

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.09

6.01

+1.08

GSJY vs. DFJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSJY Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the DFJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSJY and DFJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSJYDFJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.65

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.60

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.51

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.31

+0.24

Drawdowns

GSJY vs. DFJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum DFJ drawdown of -46.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and DFJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSJYDFJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-46.00%

+13.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-13.03%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.96%

-13.03%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.53%

-29.71%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

-40.02%

+7.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-6.92%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-11.15%

+3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

4.47%

-0.26%

Volatility

GSJY vs. DFJ - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSJYDFJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

4.15%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.17%

13.48%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

16.39%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

15.89%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

16.95%

+0.09%

GSJY vs. DFJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DFJ's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSJY vs. DFJ - Dividend Comparison

GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than DFJ's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.44%2.68%2.46%2.43%2.62%2.07%2.59%2.24%1.89%1.60%1.76%1.23%
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
1.75%1.99%1.64%2.11%2.13%1.73%1.22%2.79%3.28%1.70%2.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSJY and DFJ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSJY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to DFJ (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs DFJ's -46.00%.

On 10-year performance, GSJY leads with 9.28% vs 8.70% for DFJ. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GSJY has performed better with a 9.28% return vs 8.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DFJ.

DFJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.75% for GSJY.

GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while DFJ tracks WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 0.58% for DFJ.

DFJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSJY and DFJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer