GSJY vs. DFJ
GSJY (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF) and DFJ (WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund) are both Japan Equities funds - GSJY tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index while DFJ tracks the WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSJY returned 9.36%/yr vs 9.32%/yr for DFJ. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSJY charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for DFJ.
Performance
GSJY vs. DFJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSJY achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly higher than DFJ's 10.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSJY having a 9.36% annualized return and DFJ not far behind at 9.32%.
GSJY
- 1D
- -3.94%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 12.58%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 31.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
DFJ
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
GSJY vs. DFJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 12.58% | 26.22% | 8.89% | 19.18% | -16.15% | 0.41% | 13.81% | 18.29% | -11.56% | 25.50% |
DFJ WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund | 10.30% | 31.90% | 2.80% | 21.81% | -9.00% | 0.38% | 1.29% | 16.98% | -18.53% | 32.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSJY and DFJ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2016 | 0.83 |
The correlation between GSJY and DFJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GSJY vs. DFJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSJY
DFJ
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
GSJY
DFJ
Technology
GSJY
DFJ
Financial Services
GSJY
DFJ
Consumer Cyclical
GSJY
DFJ
Communication Services
GSJY
DFJ
Healthcare
GSJY
DFJ
Basic Materials
GSJY
DFJ
Energy
GSJY
DFJ
Consumer Defensive
GSJY
DFJ
Utilities
GSJY
DFJ
Real Estate
GSJY
DFJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSJY vs. DFJ — Risk / Return Rank
GSJY
DFJ
GSJY vs. DFJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSJY | DFJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 2.27 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.44 | 6.34 | +1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSJY vs. DFJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSJY drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum DFJ drawdown of -46.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSJY and DFJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSJY | DFJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -46.00% | +13.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -13.03% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.96% | -13.03% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.53% | -29.71% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.53% | -40.02% | +7.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.94% | -5.86% | +1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -11.14% | +3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 4.66% | -0.37% |
Volatility
GSJY vs. DFJ - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) at 5.39%. This indicates that GSJY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSJY | DFJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 5.39% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.53% | 13.93% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.44% | 16.85% | +3.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 15.96% | +2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 16.94% | +0.16% |
GSJY vs. DFJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSJY has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DFJ's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSJY vs. DFJ - Dividend Comparison
GSJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than DFJ's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFJ WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.41% | 2.68% | 2.46% | 2.43% | 2.62% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.23% |
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 1.76% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 2.11% | 2.13% | 1.73% | 1.22% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSJY and DFJ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSJY has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to DFJ (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSJY dropped -32.53% vs DFJ's -46.00%.
On 10-year performance, GSJY leads with 9.36% vs 9.32% for DFJ. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DFJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GSJY has performed better with a 9.36% return vs 9.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DFJ.
DFJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.76% for GSJY.
GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index, while DFJ tracks WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSJY and 0.58% for DFJ.
DFJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSJY and DFJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer