PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIG vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIG vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GSIG

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

USO

1D
1.33%
1M
24.23%
6M
62.44%
YTD
86.77%
1Y
66.76%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
20.59%
10Y*
5.64%
ALL TIME*
-6.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$968.42M$871.56M$931.57M

GSIG vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSIG
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
0.68%6.69%4.72%6.06%-5.80%-0.81%1.59%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
86.77%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%13.13%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIG and USO is -0.35, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020

-0.10

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GSIG and USO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.35, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIG vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSIG vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSIGUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.60

GSIG vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSIG vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIGUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.03%

Volatility

GSIG vs. USO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIGUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.29%

GSIG vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSIG vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GSIG
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
3.60%4.61%4.59%3.51%2.21%1.04%0.45%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIG and USO have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GSIG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GSIG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

GSIG has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

GSIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while USO is Oil & Gas. GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSIG and 0.86% for USO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIG and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer