PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIG vs. IGBH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIG vs. IGBH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIG achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than IGBH's 2.43% return.


GSIG

1D
0.02%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.67%
6M
1.10%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*

IGBH

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.79%
YTD
2.43%
6M
3.28%
1Y
9.61%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
5.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIG vs. IGBH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSIG
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
0.67%6.69%4.72%6.06%-5.80%-0.81%1.59%
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
2.43%7.90%7.80%12.12%-2.82%2.20%10.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIG and IGBH is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020

0.22

The correlation between GSIG and IGBH shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIG vs. IGBH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIG
GSIG Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GSIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIG Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IGBH
IGBH Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IGBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGBH Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IGBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGBH Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIG vs. IGBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIGIGBHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.38

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.83

3.58

+0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.35

+0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.63

8.63

+4.00

GSIG vs. IGBH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIG Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the IGBH Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIG and IGBH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIGIGBHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.38

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.88

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.52

+0.27

Drawdowns

GSIG vs. IGBH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIG drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum IGBH drawdown of -33.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIG and IGBH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIGIGBHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-33.67%

+24.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-4.24%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.46%

-6.93%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.57%

-10.48%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.08%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-2.67%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

1.15%

-0.79%

Volatility

GSIG vs. IGBH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) is 0.62%, while iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) has a volatility of 0.87%. This indicates that GSIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIGIGBHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

0.87%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

3.14%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

4.06%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.89%

6.13%

-3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.71%

9.21%

-6.50%

GSIG vs. IGBH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IGBH's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSIG vs. IGBH - Dividend Comparison

GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than IGBH's 6.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIG
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF
4.34%4.61%4.59%3.51%2.21%1.04%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
6.19%6.23%6.88%7.32%3.84%2.71%2.39%3.40%5.56%2.87%2.62%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIG and IGBH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGBH has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to GSIG (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIG dropped -9.57% vs IGBH's -33.67%.

On 5-year performance, IGBH leads with 5.37% vs 2.21% for GSIG. On fees, GSIG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, GSIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IGBH has performed better with a 5.37% return vs 2.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSIG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for IGBH.

IGBH has the higher dividend yield at 6.19%, compared with 4.34% for GSIG.

GSIG tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index, while IGBH tracks BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSIG and 0.16% for IGBH.

GSIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIG and IGBH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer