PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGBH vs. IGLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGBH vs. IGLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) and iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGBH achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly higher than IGLB's 1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, IGBH has outperformed IGLB with an annualized return of 5.07%, while IGLB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.20% annualized return.


IGBH

1D
0.24%
1M
0.37%
YTD
2.48%
6M
2.81%
1Y
8.91%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
5.41%
10Y*
5.07%

IGLB

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.36%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.21%
1Y
6.56%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
-2.01%
10Y*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGBH vs. IGLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
2.48%7.90%7.80%12.12%-2.82%2.20%1.09%9.62%-4.54%9.36%
IGLB
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
1.19%7.53%-1.50%11.03%-25.38%-1.68%13.30%23.19%-6.90%12.15%

Correlation

The correlation between IGBH and IGLB is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2015

0.29

Over the past year, IGBH and IGLB have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGBH vs. IGLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGBH
IGBH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IGBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGBH Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IGBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGBH Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLB
IGLB Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IGLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLB Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGBH vs. IGLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) and iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGBHIGLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.15

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

1.27

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

3.13

+4.62

IGBH vs. IGLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGBH Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the IGLB Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGBH and IGLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGBH vs. IGLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGBH drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, roughly equal to the maximum IGLB drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGBH and IGLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGBHIGLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.67%

-34.12%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.24%

-5.19%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.93%

-12.87%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.48%

-34.12%

+23.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

-34.12%

+0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-13.41%

+13.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

-8.12%

+5.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

2.10%

-0.95%

Volatility

IGBH vs. IGLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) is 0.69%, while iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB) has a volatility of 1.89%. This indicates that IGBH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGBHIGLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

1.89%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

5.80%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04%

7.76%

-3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.05%

12.38%

-6.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.21%

12.55%

-3.34%

IGBH vs. IGLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGBH has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGBH vs. IGLB - Dividend Comparison

IGBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, more than IGLB's 5.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.65%6.23%6.88%7.32%3.84%2.71%2.39%3.40%5.56%2.87%2.62%1.12%
IGLB
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
5.24%5.14%5.10%4.59%4.56%3.16%3.22%3.73%4.56%3.94%4.21%4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGBH and IGLB have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGLB has higher volatility (1.89%) compared to IGBH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGBH dropped -33.67% vs IGLB's -34.12%.

On 10-year performance, IGBH leads with 5.07% vs 2.20% for IGLB. On fees, IGLB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IGBH has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGBH has performed better with a 5.07% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGLB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for IGBH.

IGBH has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 5.24% for IGLB.

IGBH tracks BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond Index, while IGLB tracks ICE BofAML10+ Year US Corporate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for IGBH and 0.06% for IGLB.

IGBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGBH and IGLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer