GSGO vs. NRGU

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GSGO (Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - GSGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while NRGU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index. GSGO is actively managed, while NRGU is passively managed. Their -0.29 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GSGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.

Performance

GSGO vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSGO achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 157.14% return.

GSGO

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: -2.59%
• 6M: 7.57%
• YTD: 6.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

NRGU

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: 51.26%
• 6M: 91.25%
• YTD: 157.14%
• 1Y: 166.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 50.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF	$292.33K	$361.30K	$297.31K
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	$4.57M	$4.13M	$3.95M

GSGO vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF	6.78%	0.81%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	157.14%	-15.42%

Correlation

The correlation between GSGO and NRGU is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	-0.29

Return for Risk

GSGO vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSGO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 75
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 69
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSGO vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSGO	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.92	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.31	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.38	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.59	—

Drawdowns

GSGO vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSGO drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGO and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSGO	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.88%	-57.50%	+43.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-43.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.75%	-11.31%	+5.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.26%	-25.74%	+22.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	19.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GSGO	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	22.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	64.33%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.69%	77.39%	-57.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.69%	88.47%	-68.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.69%	88.47%	-68.78%

GSGO vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSGO vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither GSGO nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSGO and NRGU in my portfolio?

GSGO and NRGU have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GSGO or NRGU?

On fees, GSGO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSGO or NRGU?

GSGO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSGO or NRGU?

GSGO and NRGU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GSGO and NRGU?

GSGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NRGU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GSGO and 0.95% for NRGU.