GSGO vs. GPIQ
GSGO (Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GSGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.
Performance
GSGO vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSGO achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 11.67% return.
GSGO
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GPIQ
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- 11.67%
- 1Y
- 24.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $86.57M | $81.60M | $83.20M | |
| $292.33K | $361.30K | $297.31K |
GSGO vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 6.78% | 0.81% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 11.67% | 1.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSGO and GPIQ is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSGO vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
GSGO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GPIQ
GSGO vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSGO | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSGO vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSGO drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, smaller than the maximum GPIQ drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGO and GPIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSGO | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -21.06% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -5.90% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -2.33% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.68% | — |
Volatility
GSGO vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSGO | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 16.69% | +3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 18.06% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 18.06% | +1.63% |
GSGO vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSGO vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
GSGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.32% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% |
GSGO Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GSGO and GPIQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GSGO.
GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 0.00% for GSGO.
GSGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GSGO and 0.29% for GPIQ.
Find the right allocation for GSGO and GPIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer