PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSGIX vs. GSBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSGIX vs. GSBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund (GSGIX) and Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSGIX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than GSBFX's 4.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GSGIX has underperformed GSBFX with an annualized return of 1.71%, while GSBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.97% annualized return.


GSGIX

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.14%
6M
0.38%
1Y
3.68%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*
1.71%

GSBFX

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.95%
YTD
4.73%
6M
5.31%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
10.76%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
6.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSGIX vs. GSBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSGIX
Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund
0.14%5.09%0.86%7.66%-12.98%-2.59%8.90%10.17%-0.12%2.43%
GSBFX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund
4.73%10.42%9.32%9.64%-9.53%10.50%9.53%19.38%-4.92%7.94%

Correlation

The correlation between GSGIX and GSBFX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995

0.08

Over the past year, GSGIX and GSBFX have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSGIX vs. GSBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSGIX
GSGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
GSGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GSGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

GSBFX
GSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSGIX vs. GSBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund (GSGIX) and Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSGIXGSBFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

2.47

-1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

3.55

-1.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.47

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

3.14

-1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.92

13.71

-9.79

GSGIX vs. GSBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the GSBFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSGIX and GSBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSGIXGSBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

2.47

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.74

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.88

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.70

+0.47

Drawdowns

GSGIX vs. GSBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSGIX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum GSBFX drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGIX and GSBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSGIXGSBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.90%

-37.04%

+17.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-4.44%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.49%

-8.14%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.27%

-15.94%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.90%

-23.42%

+3.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.19%

-0.04%

-5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-4.18%

+1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

1.02%

+0.06%

Volatility

GSGIX vs. GSBFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund (GSGIX) is 1.31%, while Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) has a volatility of 1.71%. This indicates that GSGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSGIXGSBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

1.71%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

4.44%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26%

5.48%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.66%

7.41%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.12%

7.99%

-3.87%

GSGIX vs. GSBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSGIX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than GSBFX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSGIX vs. GSBFX - Dividend Comparison

GSGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than GSBFX's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSBFX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund
5.11%4.39%5.12%3.41%4.10%6.66%3.05%3.52%3.98%3.52%3.78%3.93%
GSGIX
Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund
3.01%3.01%2.64%2.12%1.60%1.32%5.04%4.13%1.28%1.74%1.40%5.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSGIX and GSBFX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSBFX has higher volatility (1.71%) compared to GSGIX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSGIX dropped -19.90% vs GSBFX's -37.04%.

GSBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSGIX and GSBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer