GSG vs. CCOM
GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) and CCOM (Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. GSG is passively managed, while CCOM is actively managed. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GSG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CCOM.
Performance
GSG vs. CCOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GSG
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 27.47%
- YTD
- 35.21%
- 1Y
- 38.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 14.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.24%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.27%
CCOM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $489.06 | $1.63K | $4.84K | |
| $17.98M | $16.40M | $25.53M |
GSG vs. CCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 25.47% |
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | -3.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSG and CCOM is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSG vs. CCOM — Risk / Return Rank
GSG
CCOM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GSG vs. CCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSG | CCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSG vs. CCOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSG drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, which is greater than CCOM's maximum drawdown of -7.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSG and CCOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSG | CCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.62% | -7.44% | -82.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.18% | -5.67% | -53.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.67% | -3.35% | -60.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.85% | — | — |
Volatility
GSG vs. CCOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSG | CCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.37% | 12.48% | +11.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 12.48% | +10.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.07% | 12.48% | +9.59% |
GSG vs. CCOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOM's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSG vs. CCOM - Dividend Comparison
GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | 1.26% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSG and CCOM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CCOM.
CCOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GSG and 0.99% for CCOM.
Find the right allocation for GSG and CCOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer