PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSFTX vs. FIHBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSFTX vs. FIHBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX) and Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSFTX achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly higher than FIHBX's 1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, GSFTX has outperformed FIHBX with an annualized return of 12.46%, while FIHBX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.04% annualized return.


GSFTX

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.06%
YTD
8.01%
6M
8.45%
1Y
20.67%
3Y*
16.55%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
12.46%

FIHBX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.90%
1Y
6.38%
3Y*
8.28%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
5.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSFTX vs. FIHBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSFTX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund
8.01%15.88%15.00%10.57%-4.94%26.26%7.75%28.12%-4.38%20.16%
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
1.16%8.59%6.40%13.17%-12.64%3.92%5.99%15.01%-2.80%7.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GSFTX and FIHBX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2002

0.30

The correlation between GSFTX and FIHBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSFTX vs. FIHBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSFTX
GSFTX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GSFTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSFTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSFTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GSFTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSFTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FIHBX
FIHBX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FIHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FIHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSFTX vs. FIHBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX) and Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSFTXFIHBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.50

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

2.66

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.96

14.04

-0.08

GSFTX vs. FIHBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSFTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the FIHBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSFTX and FIHBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSFTXFIHBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.92

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.67

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.88

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

1.36

-0.81

Drawdowns

GSFTX vs. FIHBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSFTX drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, which is greater than FIHBX's maximum drawdown of -31.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSFTX and FIHBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSFTXFIHBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.69%

-31.05%

-16.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.51%

-2.45%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.01%

-3.60%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.01%

-16.35%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.76%

-21.67%

-11.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.11%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-2.30%

-4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

0.46%

+1.00%

Volatility

GSFTX vs. FIHBX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX) has a higher volatility of 2.37% compared to Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) at 1.06%. This indicates that GSFTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIHBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSFTXFIHBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

1.06%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.81%

2.73%

+4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

3.39%

+5.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

5.19%

+8.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

5.76%

+9.93%

GSFTX vs. FIHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSFTX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FIHBX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSFTX vs. FIHBX - Dividend Comparison

GSFTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than FIHBX's 6.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
6.45%6.29%5.94%5.93%4.58%4.25%5.14%5.79%6.24%5.55%5.75%6.46%
GSFTX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund
5.00%5.35%6.02%4.96%3.87%2.87%1.74%2.90%7.63%4.00%3.77%8.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSFTX and FIHBX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSFTX has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to FIHBX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSFTX dropped -47.69% vs FIHBX's -31.05%.

GSFTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSFTX and FIHBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer