GSFTX vs. AGRFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX) and AB Growth Fund (AGRFX).
GSFTX is managed by Columbia Threadneedle. It was launched on Mar 4, 1998. AGRFX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSFTX or AGRFX.
Key characteristics
| GSFTX | AGRFX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.61% | 32.90% |
| 1Y Return | 28.01% | 34.48% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.53% | 2.46% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.04% | 10.13% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.26% | 7.92% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.93 | 1.99 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.14 | 2.54 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.54 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.67 | 1.43 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.25 | 9.76 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.44% | 3.55% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.46% | 17.43% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.69% | -61.88% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.45% | -0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSFTX and AGRFX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GSFTX vs. AGRFX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GSFTX achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly lower than AGRFX's 32.90% return. Over the past 10 years, GSFTX has outperformed AGRFX with an annualized return of 11.26%, while AGRFX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.92% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSFTX vs. AGRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSFTX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than AGRFX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSFTX vs. AGRFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX) and AB Growth Fund (AGRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSFTX vs. AGRFX - Dividend Comparison
GSFTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, while AGRFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSFTX Columbia Dividend Income Fund | 1.70% | 1.95% | 1.93% | 1.46% | 1.74% | 1.82% | 2.22% | 1.78% | 1.94% | 2.92% | 2.26% | 1.94% |
AGRFX AB Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GSFTX vs. AGRFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSFTX drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, smaller than the maximum AGRFX drawdown of -61.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSFTX and AGRFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSFTX vs. AGRFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX) is 3.22%, while AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that GSFTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.