PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSFTX vs. LBSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSFTX vs. LBSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSFTX having a 12.19% return and LBSAX slightly lower at 12.04%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSFTX having a 12.52% annualized return and LBSAX not far behind at 12.25%.


GSFTX

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.72%
6M
7.79%
YTD
12.19%
1Y
22.02%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
12.52%
ALL TIME*
9.29%

LBSAX

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.70%
6M
7.67%
YTD
12.04%
1Y
21.71%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
12.25%
ALL TIME*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GSFTX vs. LBSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSFTX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund
12.19%15.88%15.00%10.57%-4.94%26.26%7.75%28.12%-4.38%20.16%
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
12.04%15.58%14.73%10.26%-5.19%25.97%7.48%27.84%-4.62%19.96%

Correlation

The correlation between GSFTX and LBSAX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2002

1.00

The correlation between GSFTX and LBSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSFTX vs. LBSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSFTX
GSFTX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GSFTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSFTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSFTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GSFTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSFTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

LBSAX
LBSAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LBSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LBSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSFTX vs. LBSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSFTXLBSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

3.65

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.19

13.88

+0.32

GSFTX vs. LBSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSFTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the LBSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSFTX and LBSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSFTX vs. LBSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSFTX drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, roughly equal to the maximum LBSAX drawdown of -47.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSFTX and LBSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSFTXLBSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.69%

-47.89%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.51%

-5.52%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.01%

-13.03%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.01%

-17.16%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.76%

-32.82%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-1.20%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-5.22%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

1.46%

-0.01%

Volatility

GSFTX vs. LBSAX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) have volatilities of 2.43% and 2.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSFTXLBSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

2.41%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

6.76%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.22%

9.23%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.23%

13.23%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

15.67%

-0.01%

GSFTX vs. LBSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSFTX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than LBSAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSFTX vs. LBSAX - Dividend Comparison

GSFTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than LBSAX's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSFTX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund
4.81%5.35%6.02%4.96%3.87%2.87%1.74%2.90%7.63%4.00%3.77%8.27%
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
4.58%5.11%5.78%4.72%3.62%2.65%1.52%2.68%7.36%3.83%3.60%8.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, GSFTX and LBSAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GSFTX has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to LBSAX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSFTX dropped -47.69% vs LBSAX's -47.89%.

GSFTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSFTX and LBSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer