GSEU vs. LCTD
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD).
GSEU and LCTD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSEU is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index. It was launched on Mar 2, 2016. LCTD is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2021.
Performance
GSEU vs. LCTD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSEU vs. LCTD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEU Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF | 0.39% | 35.70% | 2.00% | 20.74% | -17.90% | 9.11% |
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 2.78% | 30.42% | 3.14% | 17.10% | -16.16% | 4.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEU achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than LCTD's 2.78% return.
GSEU
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -4.54%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 5.00%
- 1Y
- 22.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
LCTD
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSEU vs. LCTD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LCTD's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GSEU vs. LCTD — Risk / Return Rank
GSEU
LCTD
GSEU vs. LCTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSEU | LCTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 1.51 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 2.10 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 2.41 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 9.04 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSEU | LCTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 1.51 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.45 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEU and LCTD is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSEU vs. LCTD - Dividend Comparison
GSEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than LCTD's 3.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEU Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF | 2.71% | 2.72% | 2.35% | 3.41% | 3.34% | 2.71% | 1.84% | 3.69% | 3.40% | 2.51% | 2.74% |
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 3.51% | 3.61% | 3.74% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GSEU vs. LCTD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEU drawdown since its inception was -35.71%, which is greater than LCTD's maximum drawdown of -29.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEU and LCTD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEU | LCTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.71% | -29.82% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -10.92% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.00% | -6.46% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -6.91% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.91% | +0.20% |
Volatility
GSEU vs. LCTD - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) have volatilities of 7.39% and 7.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSEU | LCTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 7.20% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 11.09% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.44% | 17.12% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 16.03% | +0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 16.03% | +2.00% |