PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEE vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEE vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 27.44% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 68.27% return.


GSEE

1D
-1.36%
1M
8.70%
YTD
27.44%
6M
30.18%
1Y
54.30%
3Y*
23.60%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*

EWT

1D
-0.20%
1M
18.24%
YTD
68.27%
6M
72.42%
1Y
110.37%
3Y*
38.34%
5Y*
18.33%
10Y*
19.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEE vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSEE
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
27.44%33.38%4.94%11.03%-19.57%-2.61%43.54%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
68.27%28.38%16.11%23.97%-28.90%26.18%48.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEE and EWT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020

0.79

The correlation between GSEE and EWT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSEE vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEE
EWT

Technology

36.0%
72.9%

Financial Services

18.8%
13.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
1.9%

Industrials

9.0%
4.9%

Communication Services

6.6%
1.9%

Basic Materials

6.3%
3.5%

Energy

4.0%

-

Healthcare

3.1%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
1.1%

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Technology

GSEE
36.0%
EWT
72.9%

Financial Services

GSEE
18.8%
EWT
13.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEE
9.7%
EWT
1.9%

Industrials

GSEE
9.0%
EWT
4.9%

Communication Services

GSEE
6.6%
EWT
1.9%

Basic Materials

GSEE
6.3%
EWT
3.5%

Energy

GSEE
4.0%
EWT

-

Healthcare

GSEE
3.1%
EWT
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

GSEE
3.0%
EWT
1.1%

Utilities

GSEE
2.3%
EWT

-

Real Estate

GSEE
1.2%
EWT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEE vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEE
GSEE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEE vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSEEEWTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.80

4.42

-1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.63

5.00

-1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.69

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

10.56

-6.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.02

32.40

-16.37

GSEE vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEE Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 4.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEE and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSEEEWTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

4.42

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.82

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.26

+0.51

Drawdowns

GSEE vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and EWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEEEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.51%

-64.37%

+26.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-10.51%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.39%

-25.66%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.97%

-38.88%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-0.20%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-19.23%

+4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

3.42%

-0.02%

Volatility

GSEE vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) is 8.68%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that GSEE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEEEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.68%

10.43%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.80%

20.52%

-3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.52%

25.10%

-5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

22.59%

-4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

21.60%

-3.21%

GSEE vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSEE vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than EWT's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.63%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%
GSEE
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.98%2.53%2.79%3.07%3.05%6.10%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSEE and EWT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWT has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to GSEE (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEE dropped -37.51% vs EWT's -64.37%.

On 5-year performance, EWT leads with 18.33% vs 7.49% for GSEE. On fees, GSEE is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, GSEE has been the lower-risk option at 8.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EWT has performed better with a 18.33% return vs 7.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEE is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.

EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 1.98% for GSEE.

GSEE tracks Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for GSEE and 0.59% for EWT.

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.42 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEE and EWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer