GSEE vs. EWT
GSEE (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - GSEE tracks the Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSEE returned 7.49%/yr vs 18.33%/yr for EWT. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSEE charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWT.
Performance
GSEE vs. EWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 27.44% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 68.27% return.
GSEE
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 27.44%
- 6M
- 30.18%
- 1Y
- 54.30%
- 3Y*
- 23.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- —
EWT
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 18.24%
- YTD
- 68.27%
- 6M
- 72.42%
- 1Y
- 110.37%
- 3Y*
- 38.34%
- 5Y*
- 18.33%
- 10Y*
- 19.90%
GSEE vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 27.44% | 33.38% | 4.94% | 11.03% | -19.57% | -2.61% | 43.54% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 68.27% | 28.38% | 16.11% | 23.97% | -28.90% | 26.18% | 48.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEE and EWT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020 | 0.79 |
The correlation between GSEE and EWT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSEE vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSEE
EWT
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
GSEE
EWT
Financial Services
GSEE
EWT
Consumer Cyclical
GSEE
EWT
Industrials
GSEE
EWT
Communication Services
GSEE
EWT
Basic Materials
GSEE
EWT
Energy
GSEE
EWT
-
Healthcare
GSEE
EWT
Consumer Defensive
GSEE
EWT
Utilities
GSEE
EWT
-
Real Estate
GSEE
EWT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSEE vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank
GSEE
EWT
GSEE vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSEE | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.80 | 4.42 | -1.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.63 | 5.00 | -1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.69 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 10.56 | -6.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.02 | 32.40 | -16.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSEE | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 4.42 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.82 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.26 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
GSEE vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and EWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEE | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.51% | -64.37% | +26.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -10.51% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.39% | -25.66% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.97% | -38.88% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -0.20% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.73% | -19.23% | +4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.42% | -0.02% |
Volatility
GSEE vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) is 8.68%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that GSEE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSEE | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.68% | 10.43% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.80% | 20.52% | -3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 25.10% | -5.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 22.59% | -4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 21.60% | -3.21% |
GSEE vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSEE vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison
GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than EWT's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 2.63% | 4.43% | 3.32% | 8.12% | 18.82% | 0.55% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% |
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.98% | 2.53% | 2.79% | 3.07% | 3.05% | 6.10% | 2.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSEE and EWT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWT has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to GSEE (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEE dropped -37.51% vs EWT's -64.37%.
On 5-year performance, EWT leads with 18.33% vs 7.49% for GSEE. On fees, GSEE is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, GSEE has been the lower-risk option at 8.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EWT has performed better with a 18.33% return vs 7.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSEE is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.
EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 1.98% for GSEE.
GSEE tracks Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for GSEE and 0.59% for EWT.
EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.42 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSEE and EWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer