GSEE vs. EJAN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GSEE (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and EJAN (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January) are both exchange-traded funds - GSEE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while EJAN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSEE returned 7.36%/yr vs 3.53%/yr for EJAN. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GSEE charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EJAN.

Performance

GSEE vs. EJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 17.18% return, which is significantly higher than EJAN's 6.14% return.

GSEE

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: -2.59%
• 6M: 7.84%
• YTD: 17.18%
• 1Y: 33.85%
• 3Y*: 17.89%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.23%

EJAN

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 0.75%
• 6M: 3.18%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 1Y: 11.50%
• 3Y*: 6.90%
• 5Y*: 3.53%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	$267.44K	$193.23K	$472.80K
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF	$245.60K	$176.21K	$183.66K

GSEE vs. EJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF	17.18%	33.38%	4.94%	11.03%	-19.57%	-2.61%	43.54%
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	6.14%	14.78%	2.69%	5.37%	-8.01%	-1.53%	23.02%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEE and EJAN is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020	0.90

The correlation between GSEE and EJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSEE vs. EJAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GSEE	EJAN
Technology	39.9%	45.2%
Financial Services	19.6%	18.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	7.5%
Industrials	6.8%	6.3%
Communication Services	6.1%	6.0%
Basic Materials	5.4%	5.5%
Energy	3.2%	3.2%
Healthcare	2.8%	2.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	2.6%
Utilities	2.1%	1.8%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.0%

Return for Risk

GSEE vs. EJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSEE

GSEE Risk / Return Rank: 61
GSEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
GSEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
GSEE Omega Ratio Rank: 62
GSEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
GSEE Martin Ratio Rank: 61

EJAN

EJAN Risk / Return Rank: 56
EJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
EJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
EJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 67
EJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
EJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSEE vs. EJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSEE	EJAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.30	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	1.87	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.29	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	1.69	+0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.35	7.40	-0.06

GSEE vs. EJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the EJAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEE and EJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSEE vs. EJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, which is greater than EJAN's maximum drawdown of -22.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and EJAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSEE	EJAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.51%	-22.23%	-15.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.07%	-6.63%	-7.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.39%	-11.75%	-5.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.16%	-20.84%	-11.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.05%	-0.80%	-9.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.52%	-5.67%	-8.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.54%	1.51%	+3.03%

Volatility

GSEE vs. EJAN - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) at 2.75%. This indicates that GSEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSEE	EJAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.69%	2.75%	+5.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.57%	8.21%	+13.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.76%	8.64%	+15.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.11%	11.15%	+7.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.03%	12.63%	+6.40%

GSEE vs. EJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than EJAN's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSEE vs. EJAN - Dividend Comparison

GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, while EJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.16%	2.53%	2.79%	3.07%	3.05%	6.10%	2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSEE and EJAN in my portfolio?

GSEE and EJAN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSEE or EJAN?

GSEE has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to EJAN (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEE dropped -37.51% vs EJAN's -22.23%.

Which ETF is better, GSEE or EJAN?

On 5-year performance, GSEE leads with 7.36% vs 3.53% for EJAN. On fees, GSEE is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, EJAN has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSEE or EJAN?

Over the 5-year period, GSEE has performed better with a 7.36% return vs 3.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSEE or EJAN?

GSEE is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSEE or EJAN?

GSEE has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.00% for EJAN.

What is the main difference between GSEE and EJAN?

GSEE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EJAN is Defined Outcome. GSEE tracks Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while EJAN tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for GSEE and 0.89% for EJAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.