EJAN vs. FDLO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EJAN (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January) and FDLO (Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds - EJAN tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index while FDLO tracks the Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EJAN returned 3.11%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for FDLO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EJAN charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDLO.

Performance

EJAN vs. FDLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EJAN achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly higher than FDLO's 5.00% return.

EJAN

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 6.81%
• 6M: 7.51%
• 1Y: 16.24%
• 3Y*: 8.61%
• 5Y*: 3.11%
• 10Y*: —

FDLO

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 4.24%
• 1Y: 15.16%
• 3Y*: 14.30%
• 5Y*: 10.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EJAN vs. FDLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	6.81%	14.78%	2.69%	5.37%	-8.01%	-1.53%	10.46%
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF	5.00%	11.77%	16.06%	16.38%	-10.38%	24.00%	11.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EJAN and FDLO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020	0.52

The correlation between EJAN and FDLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

EJAN vs. FDLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EJAN	FDLO
Technology	37.0%	33.1%
Financial Services	19.4%	12.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	10.2%
Industrials	7.5%	9.1%
Communication Services	6.9%	10.8%
Basic Materials	6.5%	1.7%
Energy	4.0%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	4.7%
Healthcare	2.9%	9.5%
Utilities	2.1%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.1%	2.3%

Return for Risk

EJAN vs. FDLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJAN

EJAN Risk / Return Rank: 63
EJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 79
EJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
EJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FDLO

FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 49
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJAN vs. FDLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EJAN	FDLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.74	+0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	2.48	+0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.31	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	2.13	+0.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.66	9.30	+2.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EJAN vs. FDLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the FDLO Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EJAN and FDLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EJAN	FDLO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	1.74	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.78	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.83	-0.47

Drawdowns

EJAN vs. FDLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJAN drawdown since its inception was -22.23%, smaller than the maximum FDLO drawdown of -34.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJAN and FDLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EJAN	FDLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.23%	-34.35%	+12.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.63%	-7.13%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.75%	-13.68%	+1.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.00%	-19.23%	-2.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.91%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.79%	-3.38%	-2.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.42%	1.63%	-0.21%

Volatility

EJAN vs. FDLO - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) has a higher volatility of 2.10% compared to Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) at 1.91%. This indicates that EJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EJAN	FDLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.10%	1.91%	+0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.28%	6.41%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.91%	8.75%	-0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.11%	13.07%	-1.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.69%	15.50%	-2.81%

EJAN vs. FDLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EJAN has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FDLO's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

EJAN vs. FDLO - Dividend Comparison

EJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF	1.36%	1.37%	1.40%	1.35%	1.49%	1.11%	1.38%	1.55%	1.76%	1.61%	0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EJAN and FDLO in my portfolio?

EJAN and FDLO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EJAN or FDLO?

EJAN has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to FDLO (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EJAN dropped -22.23% vs FDLO's -34.35%.

Which ETF is better, EJAN or FDLO?

On 5-year performance, FDLO leads with 10.12% vs 3.11% for EJAN. On fees, FDLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 1.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EJAN or FDLO?

Over the 5-year period, FDLO has performed better with a 10.12% return vs 3.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EJAN or FDLO?

FDLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EJAN or FDLO?

FDLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for EJAN.

What is the main difference between EJAN and FDLO?

EJAN tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EJAN and 0.29% for FDLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.