GSEE vs. EEMA
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA).
GSEE and EEMA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSEE is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. It was launched on May 12, 2020. EEMA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index. It was launched on Feb 8, 2012. Both GSEE and EEMA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GSEE vs. EEMA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSEE vs. EEMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 3.91% | 33.38% | 4.94% | 11.03% | -19.57% | -2.61% | 43.54% |
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | 1.82% | 33.27% | 10.23% | 6.57% | -21.49% | -4.22% | 46.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEE achieves a 3.91% return, which is significantly higher than EEMA's 1.82% return.
GSEE
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 6M
- 8.00%
- 1Y
- 32.92%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- —
EEMA
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- -10.12%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSEE vs. EEMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSEE vs. EEMA — Risk / Return Rank
GSEE
EEMA
GSEE vs. EEMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSEE | EEMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.69 | 1.47 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 2.07 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.30 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.19 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.61 | 8.36 | +1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSEE | EEMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 1.47 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.14 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.29 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEE and EEMA is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSEE vs. EEMA - Dividend Comparison
GSEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than EEMA's 1.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEE Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.79% | 3.07% | 3.05% | 6.10% | 2.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.74% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.19% | 1.15% | 1.86% | 2.17% | 1.74% | 1.74% | 2.44% |
Drawdowns
GSEE vs. EEMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEE drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, smaller than the maximum EEMA drawdown of -44.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEE and EEMA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEE | EEMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.51% | -44.18% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -14.30% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.06% | -40.87% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.22% | -11.25% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.10% | -14.12% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 3.75% | -0.37% |
Volatility
GSEE vs. EEMA - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) have volatilities of 9.92% and 10.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSEE | EEMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.92% | 10.20% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.49% | 15.24% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.54% | 21.30% | -1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 19.94% | -2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 20.65% | -2.61% |