EEMA vs. MATFX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) and Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX).
EEMA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index. It was launched on Feb 8, 2012. MATFX is managed by Matthews. It was launched on Dec 26, 1999.
Performance
EEMA vs. MATFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EEMA vs. MATFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | 1.82% | 33.27% | 10.23% | 6.57% | -21.49% | -4.22% | 25.17% | 18.60% | -15.76% | 43.41% |
MATFX Matthews Asia Innovators Fund | 6.71% | 30.22% | 16.47% | -1.77% | -24.66% | -5.90% | 86.75% | 29.60% | -18.59% | 52.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMA achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than MATFX's 6.71% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMA has underperformed MATFX with an annualized return of 8.32%, while MATFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.50% annualized return.
EEMA
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- -10.12%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.32%
MATFX
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- 36.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 2.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EEMA vs. MATFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MATFX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EEMA vs. MATFX — Risk / Return Rank
EEMA
MATFX
EEMA vs. MATFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) and Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EEMA | MATFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 1.72 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 2.28 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 1.92 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.36 | 6.58 | +1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEMA | MATFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.72 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.11 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.52 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.25 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMA and MATFX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EEMA vs. MATFX - Dividend Comparison
EEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while MATFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.74% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.19% | 1.15% | 1.86% | 2.17% | 1.74% | 1.74% | 2.44% |
MATFX Matthews Asia Innovators Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.54% | 31.07% | 1.67% | 0.29% | 2.63% | 8.44% | 0.00% | 15.24% |
Drawdowns
EEMA vs. MATFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMA drawdown since its inception was -44.18%, smaller than the maximum MATFX drawdown of -76.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMA and MATFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMA | MATFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.18% | -76.88% | +32.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -13.52% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.87% | -45.33% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.18% | -52.42% | +8.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.25% | -10.64% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.12% | -28.35% | +14.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 4.75% | -1.00% |
Volatility
EEMA vs. MATFX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) and Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) have volatilities of 10.20% and 9.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EEMA | MATFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.20% | 9.83% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.24% | 15.52% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.30% | 21.52% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 23.97% | -4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.65% | 22.22% | -1.57% |