GSCYX vs. SSCDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GSCYX (GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund) and SSCDX (Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GSCYX returned 10.16%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for SSCDX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSCYX charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for SSCDX.

Performance

GSCYX vs. SSCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSCYX achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly lower than SSCDX's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, GSCYX has underperformed SSCDX with an annualized return of 10.16%, while SSCDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.

GSCYX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 3.39%
• YTD: 14.50%
• 6M: 14.12%
• 1Y: 28.52%
• 3Y*: 14.53%
• 5Y*: 5.68%
• 10Y*: 10.16%

SSCDX

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 16.85%
• 6M: 16.19%
• 1Y: 32.90%
• 3Y*: 19.16%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: 10.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSCYX vs. SSCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSCYX GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund	14.50%	6.03%	10.58%	14.91%	-17.84%	22.04%	20.07%	25.28%	-12.62%	13.12%
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund	16.85%	12.90%	15.50%	15.50%	-17.15%	23.46%	16.21%	27.12%	-17.10%	13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GSCYX and SSCDX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2015	0.95

The correlation between GSCYX and SSCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GSCYX vs. SSCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSCYX

GSCYX Risk / Return Rank: 41
GSCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GSCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GSCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
GSCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
GSCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

SSCDX

SSCDX Risk / Return Rank: 64
SSCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
SSCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SSCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SSCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SSCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSCYX vs. SSCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSCYX	SSCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.16	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	3.01	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.37	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	4.28	-1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.27	15.11	-4.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSCYX vs. SSCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSCYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SSCDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSCYX and SSCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSCYX	SSCDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.16	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.46	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.52	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.48	-0.27

Drawdowns

GSCYX vs. SSCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSCYX drawdown since its inception was -63.53%, which is greater than SSCDX's maximum drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCYX and SSCDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSCYX	SSCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.53%	-38.79%	-24.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.07%	-8.22%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.51%	-23.99%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.95%	-27.06%	-6.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.83%	-38.79%	-2.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-2.10%	+1.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.15%	-7.00%	-8.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	2.33%	+0.64%

Volatility

GSCYX vs. SSCDX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund (GSCYX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) have volatilities of 4.98% and 5.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSCYX	SSCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.98%	5.04%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.90%	12.06%	+0.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.68%	16.33%	+1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.51%	20.09%	+3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.33%	20.70%	+2.63%

GSCYX vs. SSCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSCYX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCDX's 1.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSCYX vs. SSCDX - Dividend Comparison

GSCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, more than SSCDX's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSCYX GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund	9.87%	11.30%	6.14%	2.65%	5.13%	16.30%	1.07%	3.87%	24.79%	7.81%	1.46%	6.08%
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund	1.83%	2.21%	1.79%	1.07%	4.26%	8.47%	0.77%	1.33%	2.69%	0.85%	1.16%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSCYX and SSCDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, GSCYX and SSCDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GSCYX or SSCDX?

SSCDX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to GSCYX (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSCYX dropped -63.53% vs SSCDX's -38.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.