GSC vs. VAMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GSC (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF) and VAMO (Cambria Value and Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while VAMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSC returned 10.81%/yr vs 5.64%/yr for VAMO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for VAMO.

Performance

GSC vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSC achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than VAMO's 3.15% return. Over the past 10 years, GSC has outperformed VAMO with an annualized return of 10.81%, while VAMO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.64% annualized return.

GSC

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 4.25%
• YTD: 15.37%
• 6M: 14.45%
• 1Y: 27.08%
• 3Y*: 26.13%
• 5Y*: 21.00%
• 10Y*: 10.81%

VAMO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -1.08%
• YTD: 3.15%
• 6M: 4.57%
• 1Y: 18.13%
• 3Y*: 13.91%
• 5Y*: 8.12%
• 10Y*: 5.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSC vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSC Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF	15.37%	6.29%	13.79%	33.52%	28.40%	58.09%	-33.08%	29.69%	-19.52%	2.90%
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	3.15%	16.51%	6.11%	5.58%	8.55%	32.16%	-4.92%	-4.63%	-11.43%	3.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GSC and VAMO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2015	0.21

Over the past year, GSC and VAMO have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

GSC vs. VAMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GSC	VAMO
Technology	23.6%	8.3%
Industrials	17.5%	21.4%
Financial Services	16.5%	38.8%
Healthcare	12.4%	17.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	33.5%
Basic Materials	6.4%	7.3%
Energy	4.2%	34.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	6.5%
Utilities	3.1%	1.6%
Real Estate	2.6%	-
Communication Services	0.9%	5.0%

Return for Risk

GSC vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSC

GSC Risk / Return Rank: 45
GSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
GSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GSC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
GSC Martin Ratio Rank: 17

VAMO

VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 52
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSC vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSC	VAMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	1.63	-1.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	2.40	+1.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.99	1.28	+0.71
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	3.28	-2.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.61	9.47	-7.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSC vs. VAMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the VAMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSC and VAMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSC	VAMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07	1.63	-1.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	0.47	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07	0.31	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.00	0.24	-0.24

Drawdowns

GSC vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSC drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than VAMO's maximum drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSC and VAMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSC	VAMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.63%	-41.84%	-46.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-58.25%	-5.55%	-52.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.25%	-11.61%	-46.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.25%	-17.25%	-41.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.06%	-41.84%	-24.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.48%	-2.76%	-28.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.28%	-9.98%	-49.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.91%	1.92%	+14.99%

Volatility

GSC vs. VAMO - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) at 2.97%. This indicates that GSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSC	VAMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.99%	2.97%	+3.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	203.12%	7.66%	+195.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	403.80%	11.19%	+392.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	218.92%	17.34%	+201.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	160.38%	18.09%	+142.29%

GSC vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSC vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison

GSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than VAMO's 0.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSC Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF	0.17%	0.16%	0.66%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	0.63%	1.41%	0.84%	1.35%	1.10%	1.07%	1.03%	1.15%	1.03%	0.35%	0.56%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSC and VAMO in my portfolio?

GSC and VAMO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSC or VAMO?

GSC has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to VAMO (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSC dropped -88.63% vs VAMO's -41.84%.

Which ETF is better, GSC or VAMO?

On 10-year performance, GSC leads with 10.81% vs 5.64% for VAMO. On fees, VAMO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, VAMO has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSC or VAMO?

Over the 10-year period, GSC has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSC or VAMO?

VAMO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSC or VAMO?

VAMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.17% for GSC.

What is the main difference between GSC and VAMO?

GSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VAMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GSC and 0.65% for VAMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VAMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.