PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSC vs. REGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSC vs. REGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSC achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than REGL's 3.98% return. Over the past 10 years, GSC has outperformed REGL with an annualized return of 10.81%, while REGL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.12% annualized return.


GSC

1D
-0.49%
1M
4.25%
YTD
15.37%
6M
14.45%
1Y
27.08%
3Y*
26.13%
5Y*
21.00%
10Y*
10.81%

REGL

1D
-0.58%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
3.98%
6M
4.90%
1Y
9.25%
3Y*
10.42%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
9.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSC vs. REGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSC
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF
15.37%6.29%13.79%33.52%28.40%58.09%-33.08%29.69%-19.52%2.90%
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.98%6.89%12.26%5.41%-0.62%20.38%7.50%18.79%-3.25%10.17%

Correlation

The correlation between GSC and REGL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2015

0.24

Over the past year, GSC and REGL have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

GSC vs. REGL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSC
REGL

Technology

23.6%
2.0%

Industrials

17.5%
15.1%

Financial Services

16.5%
30.0%

Healthcare

12.4%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
9.6%

Basic Materials

6.4%
9.3%

Energy

4.2%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
3.8%

Utilities

3.1%
14.5%

Real Estate

2.6%
7.8%

Communication Services

0.9%

-

Technology

GSC
23.6%
REGL
2.0%

Industrials

GSC
17.5%
REGL
15.1%

Financial Services

GSC
16.5%
REGL
30.0%

Healthcare

GSC
12.4%
REGL
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GSC
8.8%
REGL
9.6%

Basic Materials

GSC
6.4%
REGL
9.3%

Energy

GSC
4.2%
REGL
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

GSC
3.8%
REGL
3.8%

Utilities

GSC
3.1%
REGL
14.5%

Real Estate

GSC
2.6%
REGL
7.8%

Communication Services

GSC
0.9%
REGL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSC vs. REGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSC
GSC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSC Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

REGL
REGL Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSC vs. REGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSCREGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

1.13

+0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

0.96

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.61

3.07

-1.47

GSC vs. REGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the REGL Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSC and REGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSCREGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

0.70

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.37

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.50

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.52

-0.52

Drawdowns

GSC vs. REGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSC drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than REGL's maximum drawdown of -36.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSC and REGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSCREGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.63%

-36.37%

-52.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.25%

-9.67%

-48.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.25%

-16.96%

-41.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.25%

-16.96%

-41.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.06%

-36.37%

-29.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.48%

-5.82%

-25.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.28%

-4.08%

-55.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.91%

3.02%

+13.89%

Volatility

GSC vs. REGL - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) at 3.65%. This indicates that GSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSCREGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

3.65%

+2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

203.12%

9.23%

+193.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

403.80%

13.22%

+390.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

218.92%

16.11%

+202.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

160.38%

18.33%

+142.05%

GSC vs. REGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than REGL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSC vs. REGL - Dividend Comparison

GSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than REGL's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSC
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF
0.17%0.16%0.66%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.24%2.32%2.28%2.40%2.32%2.50%2.41%1.96%2.09%1.63%1.20%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSC and REGL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSC has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to REGL (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSC dropped -88.63% vs REGL's -36.37%.

On 10-year performance, GSC leads with 10.81% vs 9.12% for REGL. On fees, REGL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, REGL has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GSC has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REGL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSC.

REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.17% for GSC.

GSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while REGL is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GSC and 0.40% for REGL.

REGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSC and REGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer