PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSBFX vs. GEIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSBFX vs. GEIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Income Fund (GEIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSBFX achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly higher than GEIIX's 1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, GSBFX has outperformed GEIIX with an annualized return of 6.97%, while GEIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.45% annualized return.


GSBFX

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.95%
YTD
4.73%
6M
5.31%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
10.76%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
6.97%

GEIIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.25%
6M
1.59%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSBFX vs. GEIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSBFX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund
4.73%10.42%9.32%9.64%-9.53%10.50%9.53%19.38%-4.92%7.94%
GEIIX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Income Fund
1.25%4.64%4.70%5.82%-1.65%0.20%2.51%3.29%1.73%1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GSBFX and GEIIX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.09

Over the past year, GSBFX and GEIIX have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSBFX vs. GEIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSBFX
GSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GEIIX
GEIIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GEIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GEIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSBFX vs. GEIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Income Fund (GEIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSBFXGEIIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

2.75

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.55

6.77

-3.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

2.16

-0.69

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

7.30

-4.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.71

34.61

-20.90

GSBFX vs. GEIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the GEIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSBFX and GEIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSBFXGEIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.75

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

2.03

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

1.87

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.90

-1.20

Drawdowns

GSBFX vs. GEIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSBFX drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than GEIIX's maximum drawdown of -4.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSBFX and GEIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSBFXGEIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-4.95%

-32.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.44%

-0.63%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.14%

-0.63%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.94%

-3.33%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.42%

-4.95%

-18.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.10%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-0.20%

-3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

0.13%

+0.89%

Volatility

GSBFX vs. GEIIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to Goldman Sachs Enhanced Income Fund (GEIIX) at 0.52%. This indicates that GSBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GEIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSBFXGEIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

0.52%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.44%

1.14%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.48%

1.54%

+3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.41%

1.43%

+5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.99%

1.31%

+6.68%

GSBFX vs. GEIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSBFX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GEIIX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSBFX vs. GEIIX - Dividend Comparison

GSBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than GEIIX's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEIIX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Income Fund
4.11%4.21%3.41%2.92%1.78%0.73%1.62%2.38%2.04%1.41%1.05%0.67%
GSBFX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund
5.11%4.39%5.12%3.41%4.10%6.66%3.05%3.52%3.98%3.52%3.78%3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSBFX and GEIIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSBFX has higher volatility (1.71%) compared to GEIIX (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSBFX dropped -37.04% vs GEIIX's -4.95%.

GEIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSBFX and GEIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer