GSAHX vs. HSPGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GSAHX (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund) and HSPGX (Emerald Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GSAHX returned 6.77%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for HSPGX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 1.03% expense ratio.

Performance

GSAHX vs. HSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSAHX achieves a 21.53% return, which is significantly lower than HSPGX's 23.61% return.

GSAHX

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -4.25%
• 6M: 17.69%
• YTD: 21.53%
• 1Y: 32.88%
• 3Y*: 18.16%
• 5Y*: 6.77%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.23%

HSPGX

• 1D: 3.23%
• 1M: -7.25%
• 6M: 17.08%
• YTD: 23.61%
• 1Y: 51.73%
• 3Y*: 27.70%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 15.38%
• ALL TIME*: 10.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GSAHX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GSAHX vs. HSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GSAHX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund	21.53%	9.13%	21.65%	18.80%	-28.78%	8.38%	54.70%	7.21%
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund	23.61%	31.62%	28.04%	18.66%	-24.65%	3.59%	38.49%	7.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GSAHX and HSPGX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019	0.94

The correlation between GSAHX and HSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GSAHX vs. HSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSAHX

GSAHX Risk / Return Rank: 59
GSAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GSAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
GSAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
GSAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
GSAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

HSPGX

HSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 78
HSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
HSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
HSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
HSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
HSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSAHX vs. HSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSAHX	HSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.79	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	2.42	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.29	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	3.44	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.43	12.12	-2.69

GSAHX vs. HSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSAHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the HSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSAHX and HSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSAHX vs. HSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSAHX drawdown since its inception was -41.67%, smaller than the maximum HSPGX drawdown of -60.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAHX and HSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSAHX	HSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.67%	-60.28%	+18.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.29%	-14.41%	+4.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.04%	-28.63%	+1.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.67%	-38.65%	-3.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.29%	-10.45%	+3.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.08%	-18.94%	+4.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	4.07%	-0.90%

Volatility

GSAHX vs. HSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) is 6.66%, while Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that GSAHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSAHX	HSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.66%	8.22%	-1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.81%	21.56%	-3.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.39%	27.62%	-5.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.84%	25.90%	-1.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.92%	25.30%	+1.62%

GSAHX vs. HSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GSAHX and HSPGX have an expense ratio of 1.03%.

Dividends

GSAHX vs. HSPGX - Dividend Comparison

GSAHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.31%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GSAHX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	10.59%	7.28%	0.19%	0.00%
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund	10.31%	12.74%	21.85%	6.43%	8.77%	19.11%	8.48%	1.45%	11.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSAHX and HSPGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, GSAHX and HSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GSAHX or HSPGX?

HSPGX has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to GSAHX (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSAHX dropped -41.67% vs HSPGX's -60.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.