GSAHX vs. UMBHX
GSAHX (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSAHX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
GSAHX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GSAHX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 20.64%
- 6M
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 32.34%
- 3Y*
- 20.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.52%
- 10Y*
- —
UMBHX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSAHX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GSAHX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund | -0.25% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSAHX and UMBHX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSAHX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
GSAHX
UMBHX
GSAHX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSAHX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSAHX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 2.70 | -2.16 |
Drawdowns
GSAHX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSAHX drawdown since its inception was -41.67%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAHX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSAHX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.67% | -1.86% | -39.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | 0.00% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -0.63% | -13.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | — | — |
Volatility
GSAHX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSAHX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.62% | 24.77% | -4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 24.77% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 24.77% | +2.17% |
GSAHX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSAHX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSAHX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
Neither GSAHX nor UMBHX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSAHX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.59% | 7.28% | 0.19% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSAHX and UMBHX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GSAHX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer