GS vs. AVDE
GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) is a stock, while AVDE (Avantis International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Over the past 5 years, GS returned 25.98%/yr vs 9.98%/yr for AVDE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GS vs. AVDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a 22.08% return, which is significantly higher than AVDE's 10.87% return.
GS
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- 12.54%
- YTD
- 22.08%
- 6M
- 20.84%
- 1Y
- 76.70%
- 3Y*
- 49.31%
- 5Y*
- 25.98%
- 10Y*
- 24.48%
AVDE
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 27.50%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- —
GS vs. AVDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 22.08% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 47.61% | 17.45% | 10.09% |
AVDE Avantis International Equity ETF | 10.87% | 38.05% | 4.88% | 17.18% | -13.68% | 13.62% | 8.26% | 7.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between GS and AVDE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between GS and AVDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GS vs. AVDE — Risk / Return Rank
GS
AVDE
GS vs. AVDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Avantis International Equity ETF (AVDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GS | AVDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.32 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 2.30 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.61 | 9.00 | +3.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GS vs. AVDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, which is greater than AVDE's maximum drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and AVDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GS | AVDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.84% | -36.99% | -41.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.42% | -11.48% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.90% | -13.46% | -17.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.84% | -28.73% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.73% | -1.09% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.65% | -6.15% | -16.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 2.94% | +2.90% |
Volatility
GS vs. AVDE - Volatility Comparison
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 11.84% compared to Avantis International Equity ETF (AVDE) at 5.57%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GS | AVDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.84% | 5.57% | +6.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.47% | 12.80% | +10.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.55% | 15.06% | +13.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.10% | 16.39% | +11.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.87% | 18.93% | +10.94% |
Dividends
GS vs. AVDE - Dividend Comparison
GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than AVDE's 3.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDE Avantis International Equity ETF | 3.84% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.01% | 2.79% | 2.46% | 1.63% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.60% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GS and AVDE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GS has higher volatility (11.84%) compared to AVDE (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GS dropped -78.84% vs AVDE's -36.99%.
GS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GS and AVDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer