PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRPM vs. VXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRPM vs. VXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPM achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than VXF's 14.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GRPM has underperformed VXF with an annualized return of 11.29%, while VXF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.55% annualized return.


GRPM

1D
0.54%
1M
0.81%
YTD
6.71%
6M
4.94%
1Y
19.10%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
11.29%

VXF

1D
0.17%
1M
3.63%
YTD
14.74%
6M
12.24%
1Y
26.60%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
12.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRPM vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
6.71%7.81%15.67%18.79%-11.63%26.35%15.60%23.05%-12.45%13.05%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
14.74%11.40%16.89%25.51%-26.52%12.31%32.45%27.96%-9.34%18.06%

Correlation

The correlation between GRPM and VXF is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010

0.90

The correlation between GRPM and VXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

GRPM vs. VXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRPM
VXF

Financial Services

29.7%
14.0%

Technology

16.9%
22.8%

Energy

13.4%
4.4%

Healthcare

12.2%
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
9.2%

Industrials

10.8%
19.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
2.5%

Basic Materials

-

4.2%

Communication Services

-

3.2%

Real Estate

-

5.8%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Financial Services

GRPM
29.7%
VXF
14.0%

Technology

GRPM
16.9%
VXF
22.8%

Energy

GRPM
13.4%
VXF
4.4%

Healthcare

GRPM
12.2%
VXF
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GRPM
11.3%
VXF
9.2%

Industrials

GRPM
10.8%
VXF
19.3%

Consumer Defensive

GRPM
5.7%
VXF
2.5%

Basic Materials

GRPM

-

VXF
4.2%

Communication Services

GRPM

-

VXF
3.2%

Real Estate

GRPM

-

VXF
5.8%

Utilities

GRPM

-

VXF
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRPM vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRPM
GRPM Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GRPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPM Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPM Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VXF
VXF Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRPM vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRPMVXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.62

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

9.21

-1.84

GRPM vs. VXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPM Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the VXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPM and VXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRPM vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPM drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum VXF drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPM and VXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRPMVXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-58.03%

+14.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-10.21%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

-26.92%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-36.39%

+8.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.12%

-41.72%

-1.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-0.88%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-9.53%

+3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.90%

-0.30%

Volatility

GRPM vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) is 3.70%, while Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that GRPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRPMVXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

6.13%

-2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

13.23%

-2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

17.81%

-1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.88%

22.43%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.22%

22.30%

-0.08%

GRPM vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRPM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VXF's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRPM vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison

GRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than VXF's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
0.74%1.19%0.95%0.96%1.28%0.92%1.16%1.25%1.50%1.14%1.00%1.43%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
1.01%1.14%1.09%1.27%1.15%1.13%1.07%1.30%1.66%1.25%1.43%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRPM and VXF have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXF has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to GRPM (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPM dropped -43.12% vs VXF's -58.03%.

On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 12.55% vs 11.29% for GRPM. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, GRPM has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 12.55% return vs 11.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GRPM.

VXF has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.74% for GRPM.

GRPM tracks S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index, while VXF tracks S&P Completion Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GRPM and 0.05% for VXF.

VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRPM and VXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer