PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRPM vs. TUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRPM vs. TUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPM achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than TUSA's 7.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GRPM having a 11.23% annualized return and TUSA not far behind at 11.06%.


GRPM

1D
0.27%
1M
0.27%
YTD
6.14%
6M
4.64%
1Y
19.85%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
11.23%

TUSA

1D
0.89%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
7.13%
6M
6.12%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRPM vs. TUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
6.14%7.81%15.67%18.79%-11.63%26.35%15.60%23.05%-12.45%13.05%
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
7.13%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-10.35%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GRPM and TUSA is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010

0.70

The correlation between GRPM and TUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GRPM vs. TUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRPM
TUSA

Financial Services

29.7%
31.9%

Technology

16.9%
6.1%

Energy

13.4%
1.9%

Healthcare

12.2%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
16.0%

Industrials

10.8%
19.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
4.1%

Basic Materials

-

14.1%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Real Estate

-

2.1%

Utilities

-

7.5%

Financial Services

GRPM
29.7%
TUSA
31.9%

Technology

GRPM
16.9%
TUSA
6.1%

Energy

GRPM
13.4%
TUSA
1.9%

Healthcare

GRPM
12.2%
TUSA
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GRPM
11.3%
TUSA
16.0%

Industrials

GRPM
10.8%
TUSA
19.8%

Consumer Defensive

GRPM
5.7%
TUSA
4.1%

Basic Materials

GRPM

-

TUSA
14.1%

Communication Services

GRPM

-

TUSA
2.0%

Real Estate

GRPM

-

TUSA
2.1%

Utilities

GRPM

-

TUSA
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRPM vs. TUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRPM
GRPM Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GRPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPM Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

TUSA
TUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRPM vs. TUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRPMTUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.85

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.66

7.28

+0.38

GRPM vs. TUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPM Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the TUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPM and TUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRPM vs. TUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPM drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum TUSA drawdown of -56.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPM and TUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRPMTUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-56.53%

+13.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-6.57%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

-18.04%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-23.35%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.12%

-42.47%

-0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-3.94%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-9.85%

+4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.57%

+0.03%

Volatility

GRPM vs. TUSA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) at 3.16%. This indicates that GRPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRPMTUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

3.16%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.40%

8.69%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

13.03%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.88%

17.63%

+3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.22%

20.13%

+2.09%

GRPM vs. TUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRPM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TUSA's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRPM vs. TUSA - Dividend Comparison

GRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than TUSA's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
0.75%1.19%0.95%0.96%1.28%0.92%1.16%1.25%1.50%1.14%1.00%1.43%
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
1.65%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRPM and TUSA have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRPM has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to TUSA (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPM dropped -43.12% vs TUSA's -56.53%.

On 10-year performance, GRPM leads with 11.23% vs 11.06% for TUSA. On fees, GRPM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRPM has performed better with a 11.23% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GRPM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.

TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.75% for GRPM.

GRPM tracks S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index, while TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GRPM and 0.70% for TUSA.

TUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRPM and TUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer