GRPM vs. TUSA
GRPM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF) and TUSA (First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - GRPM tracks the S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index while TUSA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GRPM returned 11.23%/yr vs 11.06%/yr for TUSA. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRPM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for TUSA.
Performance
GRPM vs. TUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRPM achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than TUSA's 7.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GRPM having a 11.23% annualized return and TUSA not far behind at 11.06%.
GRPM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- 1Y
- 19.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
TUSA
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 6.12%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
GRPM vs. TUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | 6.14% | 7.81% | 15.67% | 18.79% | -11.63% | 26.35% | 15.60% | 23.05% | -12.45% | 13.05% |
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF | 7.13% | 13.64% | 11.12% | 11.75% | -13.54% | 24.79% | 14.16% | 24.29% | -10.35% | 20.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRPM and TUSA is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010 | 0.70 |
The correlation between GRPM and TUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GRPM vs. TUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GRPM
TUSA
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
GRPM
TUSA
Technology
GRPM
TUSA
Energy
GRPM
TUSA
Healthcare
GRPM
TUSA
Consumer Cyclical
GRPM
TUSA
Industrials
GRPM
TUSA
Consumer Defensive
GRPM
TUSA
Basic Materials
GRPM
-
TUSA
Communication Services
GRPM
-
TUSA
Real Estate
GRPM
-
TUSA
Utilities
GRPM
-
TUSA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRPM vs. TUSA — Risk / Return Rank
GRPM
TUSA
GRPM vs. TUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRPM | TUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.26 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.85 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.66 | 7.28 | +0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRPM vs. TUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRPM drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum TUSA drawdown of -56.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPM and TUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRPM | TUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -56.53% | +13.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -6.57% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | -18.04% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | -23.35% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.12% | -42.47% | -0.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -3.94% | +1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -9.85% | +4.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.57% | +0.03% |
Volatility
GRPM vs. TUSA - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) at 3.16%. This indicates that GRPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRPM | TUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 3.16% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.40% | 8.69% | +1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.15% | 13.03% | +3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 17.63% | +3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 20.13% | +2.09% |
GRPM vs. TUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRPM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TUSA's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRPM vs. TUSA - Dividend Comparison
GRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than TUSA's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 0.96% | 1.28% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.25% | 1.50% | 1.14% | 1.00% | 1.43% |
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF | 1.65% | 1.59% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 2.31% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.14% | 0.79% | 1.24% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRPM and TUSA have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRPM has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to TUSA (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPM dropped -43.12% vs TUSA's -56.53%.
On 10-year performance, GRPM leads with 11.23% vs 11.06% for TUSA. On fees, GRPM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GRPM has performed better with a 11.23% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GRPM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.
TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.75% for GRPM.
GRPM tracks S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index, while TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GRPM and 0.70% for TUSA.
TUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRPM and TUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer