GRPM vs. IVOO
GRPM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF) and IVOO (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRPM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index, while IVOO is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GRPM returned 10.99%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for IVOO. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GRPM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOO.
Performance
GRPM vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRPM achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than IVOO's 14.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GRPM having a 10.99% annualized return and IVOO not far ahead at 11.22%.
GRPM
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
IVOO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 14.13%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 25.48%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
GRPM vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | 7.11% | 7.81% | 15.67% | 18.79% | -11.63% | 26.35% | 15.60% | 23.05% | -12.45% | 13.05% |
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 14.13% | 7.47% | 13.77% | 16.45% | -13.17% | 24.61% | 13.61% | 26.18% | -11.33% | 16.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRPM and IVOO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2010 | 0.94 |
The correlation between GRPM and IVOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
GRPM vs. IVOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GRPM
IVOO
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
GRPM
IVOO
Technology
GRPM
IVOO
Energy
GRPM
IVOO
Healthcare
GRPM
IVOO
Industrials
GRPM
IVOO
Consumer Cyclical
GRPM
IVOO
Consumer Defensive
GRPM
IVOO
Basic Materials
GRPM
-
IVOO
Communication Services
GRPM
-
IVOO
Real Estate
GRPM
-
IVOO
Utilities
GRPM
-
IVOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRPM vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank
GRPM
IVOO
GRPM vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRPM | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.29 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 2.91 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.54 | 10.61 | -2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRPM | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.65 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.42 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.53 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.62 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
GRPM vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRPM drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, roughly equal to the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPM and IVOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRPM | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -42.33% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -8.81% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | -24.22% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | -24.22% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.12% | -42.33% | -0.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.02% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -5.27% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 2.41% | +0.16% |
Volatility
GRPM vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) is 3.82%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that GRPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRPM | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 4.39% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.44% | 11.36% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 15.56% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 19.72% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 21.19% | +1.06% |
GRPM vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRPM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOO's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRPM vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison
GRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than IVOO's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 0.96% | 1.28% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.25% | 1.50% | 1.14% | 1.00% | 1.43% |
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 1.19% | 1.35% | 1.30% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 1.14% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRPM and IVOO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVOO has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to GRPM (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPM dropped -43.12% vs IVOO's -42.33%.
On 10-year performance, IVOO leads with 11.22% vs 10.99% for GRPM. On fees, IVOO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GRPM has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVOO has performed better with a 11.22% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GRPM.
IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.96% for GRPM.
GRPM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IVOO is Small Cap Growth Equities. GRPM tracks S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index, while IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GRPM and 0.10% for IVOO.
IVOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRPM and IVOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer