GRNY vs. METL
GRNY (Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRNY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal ETFs, while METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRNY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.
Performance
GRNY vs. METL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRNY achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than METL's 7.51% return.
GRNY
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 26.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRNY vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF | 9.21% | 2.06% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 7.51% | 27.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNY and METL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNY vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank
GRNY
METL
GRNY vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRNY | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRNY | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.18 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
GRNY vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNY drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, smaller than the maximum METL drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNY and METL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNY | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.18% | -27.39% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -18.48% | +15.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -8.24% | +4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | — | — |
Volatility
GRNY vs. METL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNY | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 44.85% | -26.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.25% | 44.85% | -21.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.25% | 44.85% | -21.60% |
GRNY vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRNY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRNY vs. METL - Dividend Comparison
GRNY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while METL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNY and METL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GRNY is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRNY is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
METL has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for GRNY.
GRNY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while METL is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tidal ETFs and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRNY and 0.89% for METL.
Find the right allocation for GRNY and METL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer